Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
it really has been an awful house this year with so many things that are wrong and give out bad and wrong messages of how 'groups can rule' and thrive...do you know what I mean..?...
|
Yeah, totally!
Those kind of groups usually form to some degree anyway but when they put someone in the house that they obviously knew was a really horrendous character, so bad that the only way they could make sure she lasted past the first week was did give her a pass to the final, then it throws the whole thing off balance and gives the 'stronger' group even more of an advantage!
I still can't figure out the Helen thing. Maybe she knows someone in production or her manager does ? It almost seems like a 'Trading Places' kinda' thing. Two TV execs who like a bet are chatting one night and they come up with the notion of finding one of the most dislikable characters possible, putting them in the house and one says that with the aid of favourable editing and a little 'help' they can turn the public's opinion of the person totally around from someone who wouldn't survive the first eviction to someone who wins BB. That's probably a bit far-fetched but i'm struggling to come up with a reason for putting her in there in the first place. I know she's been kind of entertaining but it's not like she's that amazing an entertainer that they needed to fiddle things to keep her in there! I'm stumped.