[Liam-]

Originally Posted by MrWong

We didn't need Judi to point out what a horrific **** Helen is.

That's not what she was deciding though was it? .. If they wanted a fair, unbiased opinion of who started or contributed to the divide in the house, they shouldn't have slung in some hag with some apparent 'psychology' degree who has been slating one of the people up for discussion all series

[Lstan]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

That's not what she was deciding though was it? .. If they wanted a fair, unbiased opinion of who started or contributed to the divide in the house, they shouldn't have slung in some hag with some apparent 'psychology' degree who has been slating one of the people up for discussion all series

exactly! that whole task was entertainment for the viewers-the verdict was just a formality EVERYONE pretty much knew the verdict as soon as J.James walked in because she has been saying her views on helen on BOTS for many weeks now. do some viewers not get this is first and formost an entertainment show and that stuff like this is set up for entertainment only?

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

That's not what she was deciding though was it? .. If they wanted a fair, unbiased opinion of who started or contributed to the divide in the house, they shouldn't have slung in some hag with some apparent 'psychology' degree who has been slating one of the people up for discussion all series

Another judge could have decided Ashleigh was to blame.

That doesn't change the fact that Helen's been a horrific **** for most of the series.