[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/sc...ing-01940.html


basic copypasta from the above article

and preaching from Eric Learner the guy who makes his living saying the big bang did not happen....


Jesus H on a bike



What next "Why I think 9/11 was an inside job"?

I read that article and perhaps 20 others and my post is a summary of what I read and research from as many sources as time allows. If it was 'copy pasta' the words would be identical. Where in the quoted article do you see any of the other points I raise or comments I make?

Obviously (except to a cretin) there are only so many ways of writing about a given subject and therefore the idiom of the source material and post will by necessity sometimes be similar - that much is unavoidable. Describe such an article without sometimes being compelled to use the correct terminology and occasional statements of the source.

You do it all the time, but you merely scour the internet then past a link without really reading, digesting or understanding the subject matter you are linking, I read, absorb, and analyse the article, then weigh it against other articles or books, before relating in my own manner.

Anyway, once again you have proved my point that you are bereft of any real, worthwhile views - no matter what the source, because you do not understand the subject - instead, you do not answer, and resort to deflecting ridicule.

Also; is it not yet more hypocrisy on your part to ridicule me for agreeing with Lerner's valid viewpoint (among others) - no matter if he makes money from his expertise - when you constantly quote Dawkins and Klauss whose viewpoints are far less credible than Lerner's and from which their primary aim is to make money? They do not give their books away.

So; ridicule wasted, deflection unsuccessful - now will you answer my questions?