[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I read they were denying he was shot in the back?

Yes Kizzy, but I'm going by the greater weight of testimony from what I deem the more credible of actual 'eyewitnesses' rather than those highly suspect 'Johnny Come Lately's whose 'testimony' I believe is deeply suspect and rather a convenient 'Deux Ex Machina' as far as the sanitized police version of events are concerned.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Yes Kizzy, but I'm going by the greater weight of testimony from what I deem the more credible of actual 'eyewitnesses' rather than those highly suspect 'Johnny Come Lately's whose 'testimony' I believe is deeply suspect and rather a convenient 'Deux Ex Machina' as far as the sanitized police version of events are concerned.

..it doesn't matter whether he was shot in the back or not though Kirk from the point that he still shot and killed Michael Brown when he was no threat to his life...

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..it doesn't matter whether he was shot in the back or not though Kirk from the point that he still shot and killed Michael Brown when he was no threat to his life...

Yes my love - you are right. Oh am I so glad you're back

Seriously Ammi, you are right - it does not matter. It's more damning, but - as you say - it does not alter the fact that Brown was not presenting a threat to anyone when Wilson shot him.