[Miranda123]

Poor little girl, will be allowed to go to birthday parties but wont be allowed to eat what all the other kids are having

what a ****ing loop, people like her should not be allowed to be parents, she wouldnt be allowed to do that if she had a foster kid?? but she can do it to the poor baby because it came out of her???

its driving me maddddd

[Denver]

I dont think parents should be allowed to say what there kids can or cant eat

[Jake.]

Pretty sure as long as her daughter is happy and healthy, she can do whatever the hell she wants. Not really appropriate to be judging a womans parenting skills.

[chuff me dizzy]

Poor kid !! not even allowed to be a child, i applauded Katie stance with her and agree, she wouldn't allowed to come to my childs party if she had to be treat different in front of everyone ,what a bloody nut job !!

[Braden]

Funniest thing in the world was Katie responding as if Alicia's crazy.

This is the woman who decides who her children can play with based on their name. I'd rather a mother who worries over their child's health in comparison to one who worries about other children's names.

[Daniel.]

She's so amazing

[Niamh.]

Her daughter eats healthily, shame in Alicia!

[erinp5]

My friends child is diabetic so any party she attends have to be planned ,most parents understand .I know lots of mums who don't like their kids eating crap.... it nothing new to be fair .

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Poor kid !! not even allowed to be a child, i applauded Katie stance with her and agree, she wouldn't allowed to come to my childs party if she had to be treat different in front of everyone ,what a bloody nut job !!

Why? That makes no sense. You wouldn't invite her because she'd be eating slightly different things to what everyone else is eating? Is that really any reason not to invite a child? That sound more ****ing bonkers than what Alicia said.

Hopkins is trying to pathetically manufacture something out of nothing and you've fallen right for it.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Stevep

Why? That makes no sense. You wouldn't invite her because she'd be eating slightly different things to what everyone else is eating? Is that really any reason not to invite a child? That sound more ****ing bonkers than what Alicia said.

Hopkins is trying to pathetically manufacture something out of nothing and you've fallen right for it.

its not fair on the CHILD, why should she be made to feel different from her mates?

[Braden]

What's wrong with being different? Eating particular food really isn't harmful to Alicia's child.

[thinkingoutloud]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Her daughter eats healthily, shame in Alicia!

There's being healthy and then there's being OTT controlling and not allowing 'indulgent' food once in a while. Massive difference between the two. Katie is largely for healthy eating, by the way.

[PrincessIona]

I think Alicia is being a little bit too strict with it, but really all she's trying to do is give her daughter a healthy diet because she loves her. Parents who allow their children to gorge on junk food are far worse

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Poor kid !! not even allowed to be a child, i applauded Katie stance with her and agree, she wouldn't allowed to come to my childs party if she had to be treat different in front of everyone ,what a bloody nut job !!

Katie's child wouldn't be allowed because your name's chuff.

[Miranda123]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Pretty sure as long as her daughter is happy and healthy, she can do whatever the hell she wants. Not really appropriate to be judging a womans parenting skills.

she's not gonna be healthy on a diet of nuts and seeds, that is my point, check the medical advice if you dont believe me, a foster parent is not allowed to enforce a vegan or vegetarian diet on a foster child in their care, do you think there is a reason for that??

anyone who agrees with her is a dangerous idiot!

[Miranda123]

Originally Posted by erinp5

My friends child is diabetic so any party she attends have to be planned ,most parents understand .I know lots of mums who don't like their kids eating crap.... it nothing new to be fair .

you are talking about specific medical need, it would be the same with my nephew, who cannot eat nuts of any kind, but we are talking about Alicias kid, who is having a diet that is blatantly bad for her health, forced on her because of an obsessive mother who has a mental problem, body dysmorphia!!

She would not be allowed to foster a child with her condition but feel free to **** up this child if it came out of you!!!

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by Miranda123

she's not gonna be healthy on a diet of nuts and seeds, that is my point, check the medical advice if you dont believe me, a foster parent is not allowed to enforce a vegan or vegetarian diet on a foster child in their care, do you think there is a reason for that??

anyone who agrees with her is a dangerous idiot!

The thing is no one knows exactly what her diet is, we saw 1 minute of what was most likely an hours discussion. So it's pretty ridiculous speculating and condemning on the basis of the edit.

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I dont think parents should be allowed to say what there kids can or cant eat

[Josy]

Its entirely up to Alicia how she wants to raise her child, as long as the little girl is healthy, happy and in no way in any danger then it's naff all to do with anyone else.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I dont think parents should be allowed to say what there kids can or cant eat

Yeah, because that's not a recipe for disaster at all.

I'm sure a lot of kids would live on chocolate and crisps if they were left to it. Thankfully, most parents care.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Miranda123

she's not gonna be healthy on a diet of nuts and seeds, that is my point

She doesn't. She just said her daughter has fish and organic chicken.

You're getting pretty irate over something we can't know the actual full extent of.

She has a pretty healthy looking 19 year old daughter too so I think she's perfectly capable of raising her children how she sees fit.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by PrincessIona

I think Alicia is being a little bit too strict with it, but really all she's trying to do is give her daughter a healthy diet because she loves her. Parents who allow their children to gorge on junk food are far worse

I agree

[erinp5]

Originally Posted by Miranda123

you are talking about specific medical need, it would be the same with my nephew, who cannot eat nuts of any kind, but we are talking about Alicias kid, who is having a diet that is blatantly bad for her health, forced on her because of an obsessive mother who has a mental problem, body dysmorphia!!

She would not be allowed to foster a child with her condition but feel free to **** up this child if it came out of you!!!

I also mean sugar free for all
here are some family friendly meals with no sugar.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...ly-dishes.html

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I dont think parents should be allowed to say what there kids can or cant eat

This! I don't get why they don't just let their kids eat what they want.

[smudgie]

Totally up to her really, as long as they are getting well balanced food.

Our kids were not allowed a salt pot of sugar dish in the house when they were little. No red meat, burgers of whatever else we deemed crap.
Never owned a chip pan either, if they had chips then a fish came with it