[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

And there's a perfect example of what I was talking about in regards to blaming those who get offended, rather than the person causing the offence in the first place.

I don't recall ever attempting to destroy her life or reputation (the latter of which she's never had a positive one to destroy in the first place). I'm merely forming judgements on the things she says in public, which is entirely fair.

And people shouldn't have to shrug everything off, if somebody is angered or offended by something, they have every right to feel that way. They're not suddenly in the wrong for reacting to something offensive that someone chose to say publicly.

Also, and I'm genuinely curious about this, why is it just Katie's comments we should shrug off? Where is the "shrug it off" attitude towards Perez, for example? Why don't you "shrug off" any negativity towards Michelle instead of making several threads blasting anyone who doesn't like her? I'm not making a dig, I'm honestly wondering where the distinction begins.

Perez has accused people in the house of really serious things. Unfounded and without basis.

He has taunted and feared and mad everyone in there feel bad. He has brought the atmosphere of the house down

EVERY SINGLE HOUSEMATE SAYS IT.

Any negativity from the forum towards Katie is based on preconceptions of her before she went in. Any negativity thrown at Michelle is because she dares to not follow the sheep and actually befriend Hopkins.

And i find irritating and intolerable that people through words around about them like, 'vile' and 'witch' etc

Its boils my piss because Michelle is a really really decent human being and I'm getting the feeling all the Perez support is FMs wanting to be anarchic and go against the grain.

It feels like trolling to me