|
User banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
|
|
User banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
The mere fact that nobody is looking at this debate correctly is sad. There are facilities that she could use closer to home BUT SHE CHOSE TO SEND HIM TO THE BEST, MILES AWAY.
Nothing against a mother wanting the best for her kid, but whilst she is rich and the others in her borough are poor, she gets preferential treatment because of who she is and the poor have to make do with what the government offer, but the poor pay taxes as well. So where is the fairness in that.
They conveniently overlooked that little fact and I personally believe that if she chooses not to accept whats on offer to her and the rest of the poor people, then she should pay if she goes for the upgraded version. I doubt anyone else in her manor with disabled children are being offered that funding, ortherwise all the schools in her area would close.
Out of all those tweets, are they telling us that not one person raised this idea. The loose women disguised this as a slant on their own girls enemy. Very clever but very dumb as well.
|