[sampvt]

Demolition DUH is an insult, please refrain

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

I've googled "Katie Price prosecuted for no motor insurance" and I've come up with zilch. I then tried, "Katie Price caught on camera whilst driving without insurance" and again it came up with nothing.

Baiting!! I wouldn't dream of posting accusations against anyone without a link and expect them to believe me...duh!

Youtube video

Don't see her being prosecuted though

[Josy]

Did she prove after that she actually was insured? sure it was in one of the newspapers, not positive though.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Youtube video

Don't see her being prosecuted though

Nah, her flash lawyers got her off. Something we mere mortals cant do.

[Ellen]

It was on a police tv show. She got pulled over for illegal plates and was found to have no insurance as well.
I am not 100% but i think at a later date she showed she was insured but there was a mix up so she got let off.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Youtube video

Don't see her being prosecuted though

Thank you bitontheside

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Ellen

It was on a police tv show. She got pulled over for illegal plates and was found to have no insurance as well.
I am not 100% but i think at a later date she showed she was insured but there was a mix up so she got let off.

Yep I'm sure I read this

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Ellen

It was on a police tv show. She got pulled over for illegal plates and was found to have no insurance as well.
I am not 100% but i think at a later date she showed she was insured but there was a mix up so she got let off.

She accused her secretary for mixing up the papers and not sending her payment in with enough time but \I do believe no further action was taken but she was defo allowed to drive away from the scene in a car with no insurance or correct plates, which is in itself a crime.

At the time she was stopped, she wasn't insured, end of. It was sorted out later so why let her drive home. We would have been impounded and asked to pay 300 quid to get our car out of the pound.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by sampvt

She accused her secretary for mixing up the papers and not sending her payment in with enough time but \I do believe no further action was taken but she was defo allowed to drive away from the scene in a car with no insurance or correct plates, which is in itself a crime.

At the time she was stopped, she wasn't insured, end of. It was sorted out later so why let her drive home. We would have been impounded and asked to pay 300 quid to get our car out of the pound.

If she had no insurance for a month or something, yes, but they always allow for delay in systems being updated. The same would apply to anyone if they were talking hours or a day or 2.

[Pink Pegasus]

"It wasn't clear that the insurance at that time had been purchased for the vehicle" "we asked her to produce the details of her her vehicle within 7 days"

"Kate Price, WAS able to prove she had valid insurance after all" "Her real trouble was having to make sure her personalised numberplate is legal"


At the start of the video they say they "stopped Jordan the other day" because of her number plates, they later say it was "within 3 weeks" since they had last spoke with her.

They said she definitely had insurance the first time they spoke, so it reasonable to believe that it had just been very recently expired then renewed so computer hadn't processed it yet when they picked her up the second time.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Baiting threads like this show you for what you are stop them. The show was seen by thousands so don't try and be clever. Google it and you will find it,

Yes i saw that programme, he is speaking the truth

[Hope Springs]

Originally Posted by sampvt

The mere fact that nobody is looking at this debate correctly is sad. There are facilities that she could use closer to home BUT SHE CHOSE TO SEND HIM TO THE BEST, MILES AWAY.

They conveniently overlooked that little fact and I personally believe that if she chooses not to accept whats on offer to her and the rest of the poor people, then she should pay if she goes for the upgraded version. I doubt anyone else in her manor with disabled children are being offered that funding, ortherwise all the schools in her area would close.
.

They said on LW today, there was no places to accommodate a child like Harvey closer to their home. If THAT is the case, then why the chuff shouldn't she get help? Every child is entitled to a free education. If what YOU say is true, then it's wrong and she should pay for the transport herself... Where did you see that there were available places closer to home?

[Hope Springs]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Harvey has been statemented, the name of the school he has to attend is named on the statement.
Not sure how much say or choice a parent has in this situation.

Depends on the needs that are on the statement. If the child has such needs that can only be met by specific schools whatever... but either way, they are entitled (statemented or not) to a place in the best school for their needs, closest to their home address.. If the nearest school able to accommodate Harvey is 50 miles from his home then I think the government should pay for the transport to get him there.
Personally however, if I had 40 Million in the bank, and had to send my child on a 100 mile round trip journey to school every single day, I would pull him out of school and I would pay for a private tutor for him in the home.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Don't let the fact that I have already posted the thread sway your judgement, lol. You might need to scroll up a but and its the post....for everyone except you but you didn't need to take that literary.

Post 72 I think

Well I did, take it literally that is. I found it quite offensive actually

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Hope Springs

They said on LW today, there was no places to accommodate a child like Harvey closer to their home. If THAT is the case, then why the chuff shouldn't she get help? Every child is entitled to a free education. If what YOU say is true, then it's wrong and she should pay for the transport herself... Where did you see that there were available places closer to home?

I think the Daily mail report said something along the lines of all the children were placed elsewhere but Katie wanted Harvey to go to a school which was 50 miles away. I derived from that that she chose the school not the local government officials. Since then I have found out that she agreed to the school he is in but its not clear if she refused another one closer to home or she asked them to statement him to the one she chose but the local laws are that if the school is a long way away, she gets assistance, but that does not extend to a private driver and a private nurse, that's crap.

He may have to have supervision but a friggin driver, no way, a taxi 2 ways would be around Ł60 max

[sampvt]

On ds they are saying a local mother said Harvey got special treatment and she has to drive her disabled son on her own nickel but I cant say if his disabilities are the same as Harvey. Its all very patchy but its front page news now so maybe Pricey will learn to shut her mouth about her private business. She seems to want everyone to know everything private about her life, its macabre because she is only mid 30's and has about 5 auto biographies already. She is a little sick to do that.

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Hope Springs

Depends on the needs that are on the statement. If the child has such needs that can only be met by specific schools whatever... but either way, they are entitled (statemented or not) to a place in the best school for their needs, closest to their home address.. If the nearest school able to accommodate Harvey is 50 miles from his home then I think the government should pay for the transport to get him there.
Personally however, if I had 40 Million in the bank, and had to send my child on a 100 mile round trip journey to school every single day, I would pull him out of school and I would pay for a private tutor for him in the home.

Home tutoring might sound easier, but I would prefer my child to mix with their peers.
As to how much she has in the bank, well, one day Harvey will be an adult,as such he needs to be somewhat dependent from his mother.
God forbid if she went bankrupt.
I dare say Katie will be paying out shedloads to help Harvey in other ways.

[Hope Springs]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Home tutoring might sound easier, but I would prefer my child to mix with their peers.
As to how much she has in the bank, well, one day Harvey will be an adult,as such he needs to be somewhat dependent from his mother.
God forbid if she went bankrupt.
I dare say Katie will be paying out shedloads to help Harvey in other ways.

I have home schooled my daughter. Im aware of the complications and issues.

I don't begrudge her a penny out of "the system" for Harvey, he is a child and as such it is HIS entitlement to the benefit, not hers.

As for a private driver, anyone who phones a taxi is hiring a private driver. A friend of mine's son is taken to school every day in a cab, only 10 miles each way, but that is the nearest for her son. He also has severe special needs and as such has to have a carer accompany him to school. I have no issue with it at all. I don't underdstand anyone who does have an issue with this. A CHILD.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Well I did, take it literally that is. I found it quite offensive actually

Post proof of this atrocity or its not true.....1-1

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Hope Springs

I have home schooled my daughter. Im aware of the complications and issues.

I don't begrudge her a penny out of "the system" for Harvey, he is a child and as such it is HIS entitlement to the benefit, not hers.

As for a private driver, anyone who phones a taxi is hiring a private driver. A friend of mine's son is taken to school every day in a cab, only 10 miles each way, but that is the nearest for her son. He also has severe special needs and as such has to have a carer accompany him to school. I have no issue with it at all. I don't underdstand anyone who does have an issue with this. A CHILD.

Me too.
Great post.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Post proof of this atrocity or its not true.....1-1

Unfortunately Sam, it didn't make the headlines but I'll shed a few tears if that would help!



ED to correct my incoherent words. Its difficult to write through tears.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Unfortunately Sam, it didn't make the headlines but I'll shed a few tears if that would help!



ED to correct my incoherent words. Its difficult to write through tears.

Don't cry, just consider yourself rinsed, lol.

[Denver]

What people need to understand is that this money is not for KP but for a disabled child and i find it saddening that some people dont think he should be entitled to any help from the goverement

[Tip]

My sister is entitled to DLA, but she doesn't claim it as she can manage without. She's always paid her taxes and is hardly well off.
It's down to one's personal attitude I guess.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Tip

My sister is entitled to DLA, but she doesn't claim it as she can manage without. She's always paid her taxes and is hardly well off.
It's down to one's personal attitude I guess.

This