| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Yes it is what you said. And here - again - is the chronological proof that you did:
What a roundabout!!!! Yes, it may be a fact but now we're back where we started: YOU SAI "He didn't care for the Pharisees and Sadducees much."TO WHICH I REPLIE "Not caring for and slaughtering and beheading are poles apart.":TO WHICH YOU SAID "Who's to say this wasn't the precursor to anti-semetism? TO WHICH I REPLIE "You are confusing the facts though; Jesus was a Jew - his followers were initially Jews, then as Christianity spread, his followers included non-Jews who still followed a Jew, and his pacifist teachings, and his Judaic beliefs, and the New Testament - which is specifically all about Christ - contains no violence nor any incitement to hatred or violence to others, so how can Christ's teachings logically be the precursor to Antisemitism? I mean; why would a Jew be Antisemitic ie; against himself?"TO WHICH YOU REPLIE "Who's confusing the facts? All I said was according to the new testament teachings of Matthew he didn't care for Pharisees and Sadducees, that's a fact",So from saying that Jesus's alleged dislike of Pharisees and Saducees could be a precursor to Antisemitism, we are now claiming that you only said he disliked Pharisees and Saducees . It's simply not true though, is it? See - You did say it. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|