Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-04-2015, 12:13 PM #1
JoshBB's Avatar
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,008

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
JoshBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,008

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
BB2024: Lily
Default

Yes we should scrap trident.

For 100bn we could spend it on much better things such as scrapping tuition fees, having a fully-funded NHS, renationalising the railways and energy.. honestly this relic of the cold war is completely pointless as we're never going to use it. Chemical nuclear weapons are NOT defense.
JoshBB is offline  
Old 09-04-2015, 12:31 PM #2
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,992


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,992


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
Yes we should scrap trident.

For 100bn we could spend it on much better things such as scrapping tuition fees, having a fully-funded NHS, renationalising the railways and energy.. honestly this relic of the cold war is completely pointless as we're never going to use it. Chemical nuclear weapons are NOT defense.
Defence, you mean.

I agree. We could spend the money on something better. Sadly, as every dictator and madman in the world either has nuclear weapons or is striving for nuclear weapons, it would be foolhardly for us, a country which has already sustained terrorist attacks from all kinds of fanatical groups, to leave ourselves completely unarmed.
Livia is offline  
Old 09-04-2015, 12:35 PM #3
Ninastar's Avatar
Ninastar Ninastar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,721

Favourites (more):
CBB15: Michelle Visage
X Factor 2014: Fleur East


Ninastar Ninastar is offline
Senior Member
Ninastar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,721

Favourites (more):
CBB15: Michelle Visage
X Factor 2014: Fleur East


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Defence, you mean.

I agree. We could spend the money on something better. Sadly, as every dictator and madman in the world either has nuclear weapons or is striving for nuclear weapons, it would be foolhardly for us, a country which has already sustained terrorist attacks from all kinds of fanatical groups, to leave ourselves completely unarmed.
Once again, very well said. It's not a good thing that we need these types of weapons... but at the end of the day, it's better to be safe than sorry.

Getting rid of these weapons would just make us an even bigger target.
__________________
Ninastar is offline  
Old 09-04-2015, 12:52 PM #4
kirklancaster's Avatar
kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


kirklancaster kirklancaster is offline
Senior Member
kirklancaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13,378


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
Yes we should scrap trident.

For 100bn we could spend it on much better things such as scrapping tuition fees, having a fully-funded NHS, renationalising the railways and energy.. honestly this relic of the cold war is completely pointless as we're never going to use it. Chemical nuclear weapons are NOT defense.
I wish that I had access to the very same 'Crystal Ball' which you lefties appear to have access to when you make such clinical definite statements as you all do.
kirklancaster is offline  
Old 09-04-2015, 03:32 PM #5
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 188,457
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 188,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshBB View Post
Yes we should scrap trident.

For 100bn we could spend it on much better things such as scrapping tuition fees, having a fully-funded NHS, renationalising the railways and energy.. honestly this relic of the cold war is completely pointless as we're never going to use it. Chemical nuclear weapons are NOT defense.

No that costs to much
Nuke gear - not liked
arista is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
destruction, mass, weapons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts