[Jake.]

Do you think they should be allowed?

[divergent]

not a valid reason at all, poor eileen's just a scapegoat

[Headie]

Justice4Eileen

Scrap the noms I say

[Drew.]

Definitely not if its the only reason

[Jay.]

not at all, she acts younger than most of them in there

[Heaven = Winner]

It's so annoying ffs

[JoshBB]

No. It's ageism and discrimination tbh. Totally unfair. Will probably be tactically voting to save Eileen if I can.

[Kizzy]

It's because she moaned about being woken up... like jim did constantly so she might win

[Margarine.]

they wouldn't allow

"Sorry Jack but you're fatter than me so I think you might get annoyed if I eat your crisps in week five"

same thing really

[Ross.]

Nope, not a good enough reason.

[Tom4784]

It's a weak copout and it shouldn't be allowed.

[just thinkin]

So unfair to eileen.....she's one of the good ones...thought it very dramatic and sneaky of jadw to blame the other girls for her nom of cristian too...gone right off her

[Lostie!]

Nominations based on age, and hypothetical situations that may never happen, should not at all be allowed.

[Jake.]

This is ridiculous, what sheep they are

[reece(:]

No I find it shocking, they should put a bunch of older HMs in and allow them to nominate the young ones on that reason, I bet they'd kick OFF.

[Withano]

Exactly what I was thinking, of course not.

[just thinkin]

Danny voted jade...wow. ..accorsing to her he was made into her

[smudgie]

Disgusting for it to be allowed as a reason.

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Margarine.

they wouldn't allow

"Sorry Jack but you're fatter than me so I think you might get annoyed if I eat your crisps in week five"

same thing really

omfg

[RichardG]

No it's a silly reason and I'm surprised it was allowed.

[lily.]

No. Those noms were ridiculous.

But, CH5 ought to have more of a range of ages in the mix. She is 51 and the next youngest is 30. Hardly a variety. I like her and I don't think it should matter how old she is. Surely it is her personality that counts.

[susie q]

No it shouldnt be allowed, she really was just the easy target for them. I hope she gets the biggest cheer on friday. I shall be voting for Sarah mainly because I dont want another fake romance but wouldnt be bothered if adjoa went instead.

[waylander1973]

It should not be a reason for a nomination, but what can you to about it.

[Daniel-X]

I think big brother should have either made them give a valid reason for nominating her or make them pick another housemate. Age ain't a reason why someone should be voted

[zakman440]

Absolutely not. The housemates who nominated her should be ashamed of themselves and Big Brother needs to get tougher with the housemates on the reasons they can and can't give.