| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
-- |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Do you mean "will never do what anyone who wants live feed wants" ?
If so, let's say they do "what people want" by making it all more "fair". Case 1 HMs slip under the radar doing nothing and giving little away until the final. (and it's maybe bad enough already !) All you end up with is Chloe and Joel in the secret room watching HMs eat their breakfast. Great ! Everyone wants that. But more watchable ? Open to debate. Even if it's "real life" better, where's the incentive to really be themselves when it might offend or make them more unpopular with their HMs ? Or even harm their chances of winning by what they say on camera ? Like Simon or not, done himself no favours by being honest has he ? Case 2 They do VTS. HMs step up to the plate worried they can't coast along. Some by acting fake, causing (and winning) arguments And people STILL complain they're unlikeable, it's unwatchable etc. So what's this alternate grand vision ? Genuinely interested to know. I'm suprised if you can't see Marc's good side tbh. In many ways think he's one of the kindest in there. Not convinced he'll win but if he did, could think of far worse winners. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Beetlejuice; 06-06-2015 at 03:10 AM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|