[JoshBB]

Vote to save keeps bigger characters in, but it's harder to get out bullies (eg. helen), and also it makes more sense that if we are voting people out to be voting to evict.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Vote to save keeps bigger characters in, but it's harder to get out bullies (eg. helen), and also it makes more sense that if we are voting people out to be voting to evict.

If there was genuine 'bullying' then BB would remove that person.

I don't like how the word 'bullying' is overused as it detracts from genuine cases of bullying. But in Helen's case it seems there is far more nastiness TOWARDS her (from angry Brian, BOTS audience members, so-called psych experts like the speakmans etc) than i have seen coming FROM Helen towards others.

But yeah i can see how the negative vote to EVICT appeals to the sort of BB viewer that enjoys the whole negative side of the experience. Some people enjoy the whole shouting 'OFF OFF OFF' at evicted HMs during their interview.

VTE encourages that type of mob anger.

Personally i think it's better to get behind your fave in a positive way rather than find HMs to hate and then put energy into hating them back (which just seems hypocritical to me)