| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
-- |
| View Poll Results: What makes a better BB? Vote to EVICT or SAVE? | ||||||
| Vote to EVICT |
|
15 | 50.00% | |||
|
||||||
| Vote to SAVE |
|
15 | 50.00% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Withano; 20-06-2015 at 05:03 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
Quote:
In your example, if Marc goes up, he is out. Someone like Chloe is as safe as houses under VTE for the most part. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
Quote:
Cause she has a big fanbase and many people like her. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
Quote:
For the most part though VTE makes it a piss easy game. Say nothing, do nothing, be nice, no nominations, you make the final. Even if you do go up, no one knows you so you aren't going anywhere. This is why we get people like Danny and Cristian, and it's so detrimental to the show. It: - festers hatred, anger and negativity and there's already enough of that as it is - encourages people to radar dive - means as soon as you start doing something, you risk leaving (case in point: Jade) Those three are reasons enough to warrant its permanent removal. |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
VTS all series long is just a game of 'who can take the most airtime' and I'm not interested in that. VTE, you'd have to befriend people and make common enemies with people to avoid nomination, all without the public hating you. Its more interesting for me to watch because its more of a game. Also Friday nights are always the highlight of the week for me in Big Brother, but they're a bit dull with VTS.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
Quote:
As for the bit in bold that's probably the easiest game ever so much that it's barely even a game. Befriending people and being nice to others is easy, it comes naturally to well, 99% of people. You don't even have to try. So you don't get put up, and even if you do you've not pissed the public off to want to evict you. Under these rules the people whom are annoying the housemates go up and most of the time get evicted, and while that may be great for the housemates, it's not great for the viewers. On a side note - I've had a discussion with you before where you've said you don't like BBUK being about a 'game'. And to be honest, a 'game' in BBUK doesn't really exist as I've just explained because it's just making friends with each other. Let's adopt the US format and see a real game of social interaction play out, because that's where you have to be clever in getting people on your side but shafting them at the same time. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I think our difference of opinion is because we watch the show differently.. You watch it as an entertainment show and I agree that vts would keep the 'entertaining' ones in longer.. I watch it as a reality show, and to me, vts gets rid of any 'real' element because it's just a show of people being as loud as possible and that's no fun for me to watch Take sallie axl for example (is that her name, the **** who lost to Gina) she basically said in her interview that she was purposely being loud and brassy because she thought it was vts.. She deliberately wasn't acting 'real'.. It wouldn't be fun for me to watch if people acted like her more often because of vts
__________________
Last edited by Withano; 20-06-2015 at 06:07 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
and EspeonBB explained my point well, VTE at least gives us a chance to get rid of the series-ruiners. Get Hopkins and Perez out under VTE and just maybe another storyline would develop, ya know?
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
Quote:
And I never buy into this argument that we should take a punt on letting some other people have a go at developing new storylines. Why evict someone who is consistent at the expense of someone who ~may~ just be coming into their own but may just fade into the background again (e.g. the Cristian vs Jade debates this week)? That's not worth the risk to be quite honest Last edited by Jack_; 20-06-2015 at 05:31 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
And I definitely buy into that argument when we've been watching the same repetitive **** on loop with Marc for what feels like months now. It's no coincidence at all that the show went to **** as soon as the intruders came in.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|