[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

The underlined bit shows that you are exactly the kind of naive gallery that aisleyne was playing to.

A TV show which could be paying you a large sum of money on the back of a "judgement" absolutely would have to make clear where the money would come from and when it would be paid.

If it didn't contain this information then what would be the point of it? How could ITV breach it and how could aisleyne sue for a breach of it? Hmm?


Also, Marc clearly stated that he had done the show and seen the contracts. I believe him over drunk, raging attack dog aisleyne.

Marc hadn't done the show, he has done other shows which includes contracts and assumed he knew everything to ever know about it, if he did say he had done the show (which I'm sure he didn't) then he was only lying to win the argument because he has not done the show.

My only argument was that Marc has no idea about an ITV contracts or a Judge Rinder contract, and he was out of line to assume he knew it all and scream down at a woman for being a liar, when really he has no ****ing idea. This is still my only argument.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Marc hadn't done the show, he has done other shows which includes contracts and assumed he knew everything to ever know about it, if he did say he had done the show (which I'm sure he didn't) then he was only lying to win the argument because he has not done the show.

My only argument was that Marc has no idea about an ITV contracts or a Judge Rinder contract, and he was out of line to assume he knew it all and scream down at a woman for being a liar, when really he has no ****ing idea. This is still my only argument.

Marc doesn't need to be nostradamus or a media barrister to know that the contract must contain the details of who would be paid by who at the ending of the case.

You really don't seem to understand what a contract is. It isn't an IOU, scribbled on the back of a fag packet. It is a very detailed and precise document, drawn up and inspected by expert lawyers in the field.

I will ask you again. If Aisleyne's contract did not contain the detail of ITV being the one to pay her, then what would be the point of the contract? How could aisleyne enforce a contract that didn't stipulate who would pay her and when?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Marc doesn't need to be nostradamus or a media barrister to know that the contract must contain the details of who would be paid by who at the ending of the case.

You really don't seem to understand what a contract is. It isn't an IOU, scribbled on the back of a fag packet. It is a very detailed and precise document, drawn up and inspected by expert lawyers in the field.

I will ask you again. If Aisleyne's contract did not contain the detail of ITV being the one to pay her, then what would be the point of the contract? How could aisleyne enforce a contract that didn't stipulate who would pay her and when?

It's a TV contract.. Every show has them.. You've applied your law degree to something very mundane..

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

It's a TV contract.. Every show has them.. You've applied your law degree to something very mundane..

It isn't a "TV contract". It is a contract. Contracts are legal or they aren't. And if money is involved then they will be legal.

Contracts have to be enforceable. A contract which doesn't say who will pay you is not enforceable.

Let us dabble in a small hypothetical...

Imagine Aisleyne wasn't paid the money by ITV. What would she do then? Would her "contract" help her if it didn't contain the details of the party that were meant to pay her?


Here are the words of Judge Rinder himself:

“The production team is incredible,” says Rinder. “It takes a substantial amount of time just to get one case through the stringent compliance regime dictated by Ofcom. It is a regulatory minefield. Under Ofcom’s regulations, I can only suggest a performance be made by one party, for example, the handing back of a set of tools. I can’t oblige them to do it. But I am allowed to make awards of damages.”

http://www.legalcheek.com/2014/08/ex...ality-tv-star/

See what he says? Stringent compliance regime by ofcom!

You really think it isn't going to be made clear to participants when/if they will be paid and who will pay them?

Sorry, but you have embarrassed yourself here.

marc was absolutely in the right. And Danny knows it too judging by this tweet:

https://twitter.com/dannypaul12341/s...27972756287488


And here, the defence case rests.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

It isn't a "TV contract". It is a contract. Contracts are legal or they aren't. And if money is involved then they will be legal.

Contracts have to be enforceable. A contract which doesn't say who will pay you is not enforceable.

Let us dabble in a small hypothetical...

Imagine Aisleyne wasn't paid the money by ITV. What would she do then? Would her "contract" help her if it didn't contain the details of the party that were meant to pay her?


Here are the words of Judge Rinder himself:



http://www.legalcheek.com/2014/08/ex...ality-tv-star/

See what he says? Stringent compliance regime by ofcom!

You really think it isn't going to be made clear to participants when/if they will be paid and who will pay them?

Sorry, but you have embarrassed yourself here.

marc was absolutely in the right. And Danny knows it too judging by this tweet:

https://twitter.com/dannypaul12341/s...27972756287488


And here, the defence case rests.

Read into it all you want, my only point was that Marc has no idea. And that I genuinely believe aisleyne didn't know the ins and outs of behind the scenes.. I still don't despite your research! It only proves what you already thought inside your own mind

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Read into it all you want, my only point was that Marc has no idea. And that I genuinely believe aisleyne didn't know the ins and outs of behind the scenes.. I still don't despite your research! It only proves what you already thought inside your own mind

There is no need for me to read into anything. I know what a contract is. And I know that a contract drawn up by ITV lawyers, concerning a show where people are awarded money, which has stringent checks on it by ofcom, will absolutely state who is going to pay who.

It really is that simple. A contract has to have the name of the party that will be paying you. If it doesn't then you might as well use it for toilet paper.

Aisleyne would also be aware of it, unless you are claiming that she didn't read the contract.