[sosadbbend]

Originally Posted by south12345

Im not a fan of Marc but do feel that it is justifiable that some people are up in arms that he has taken the flack where Brian is concerned. I dont recall Marc actually antagonising Brian without being provoked first, apart from the splashing incident. I maybe wrong of course and people may correct me on that. But Brian gave as good as he got where Marc was concerned. The thing with Marc is that he generally more controlled with his anger while having a disagreement. This maybe due to his previous army career, where he would have had to play down his temper and has dealt with discipline in a way civvies haven't.
I personally think that he is being vindicated due to his association with Helen. She was a nasty piece of work while in the house and Marc appeared to be her henchman and that didnt goad well with HM's or the viewing public.
Now Marc is backed into a corner where he appears not to understand why several of the HMs dislike him and are attacking him, at what appears to be every given opportunity. Unfortunately if you lay down with pigs some of the mud is bound to stick......Guilty by Association...

I agree with this to a point but all the HM seem to agree that Marc antagonised Brian but I don't think we saw it all, the way Marc antagonises the rest of the HM though,it wouldn't be surprising. I think Marc needs to stop denying everything and pretending he hasn't done anything wrong.
If you think of the situation with Marc and his questioning Nick about wanting to win. He tells the story differently in the diary room to make out all he asked was a simple question when he was actually trying to antagonise the situation. It comes across sneaky!