[BigBuk]

Originally Posted by Withano

Marc and Helen are incredibly similar, all they ever did was argue. Dexter had a bit of substance though, I agree. Arguments are not something I find entertaining, three arguments a day started by the same person was draining. Marc brought nothing positive to the house and it's good that he's no longer in it for the sake of the show. I found him entertaining in his first week, he changed dramatically into a one-sided shouty machine and that is so tedious.

In my eyes; Loud noises plus lots of airtime does not equal entertainment, you can tell me that I'm wrong but I get the feeling that you disagree...? Thats all Marc and Helen ever was..

The difference between Helen and Marc's arguments were that Danny was constantly looking to argue with Marc the moment the slightest opportunity arose, Danny went looking for them. When Marc asked Nick did he want to win is a perfect example, there was no need for Danny to get involved but yet he did. Marc's argument with Aisleyne too, he was sat there during the BB Hotel task keeping his character as it was part of the task and Aisleyne kept taking digs at him before he went in on her. The other arguments he had was when HMs took his jokes too seriously, rightly or wrongly. The Chloe one about an STD for an example, it was an obvious joke, people have different tastes on what's funny and what's not, matter of your personality. You can either choose to be offended or not, in that instance they chose to be offended, then an argument broke out. (that's not me condoning Marc but the HMs chose to turn it into an argument)

For me his arguments came about in a lot different ways than Helens, Marc didn't initiate them as much as people think, the majority of Helens I'd say she probably did. Dexter too was in a lot of arguments but I felt like he was an easy target to the house and he got a lot of undeserved criticism.