| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
-- |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Namaste
|
Quote:
And if I am holding on to the past, it's because BB of the past was immeasurably better IMO. As I said, the nominations interference nowadays is bad enough. Scrapping the nominations format completely would absolutely be the final nail in this show's coffin for me. BBAU did that for the first half of one of it's series, but I can't say it's something I'd love personally. Last edited by Lostie!; 07-07-2015 at 05:40 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience. Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() The format has evolved over the time but changing absolutely everything about it makes it not BB anymore. That's fairly obvious to anyone with common sense. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Namaste
|
Quote:
It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I get it you can stop trying to be funny now
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
Last edited by Jason.; 07-07-2015 at 06:19 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Scrapping the threat of being nominated by having the entire house up liberates the housemates and allows stories to progress without Gameplay. SURELY its the very basis of the BB experience and something you should be championing
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Namaste
|
Quote:
If certain housemates decide to use their nominations on a strategic level, so be it. I don't see how that would be hindering story progression, a housemate playing a strategic game is a storyline itself. The fundamental aspect of Big Brother is the social experiment, putting together different people and seeing what happens. Nominations (where we truly get to see how people are reacting to one another) is a big part of this. Stripping that aspect wouldn't be amplifying the core aspect of the BB experience, it would be draining from it. I just want the series to play out naturally. Housemates nominate, public evict, and repeat. And if they feel the need to add a twist one week (because a completely twist-free BB is definitely too much to ask for now), so be it. I understand what you're saying and why you feel that way, but it's not something I'd like. Although, your suggestion may actually be preferable to the current state of nominations. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Viewing figures tell a tale. |
||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
It blows my mind that most people still want head to head evictions, with only two people up and a VTE. Yes, that format may have somewhat worked years ago, but it does not work well in this current landscape. Many big characters go up for eviction way too early and then get evicted just because they have personality or are opinionated. That really needs to stop happening. VTS with the whole house up will ensure big characters will survive and there would be less producer manipulation. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|