Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-07-2015, 05:39 PM #1
Lostie!'s Avatar
Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
Lostie!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
Lost you're holding onto the past. You cannot keep something for nostalgia sake if it isn't working anymore.

The viewers have changed. The housemates have certainly changed.

Nominations ensure that the big characters in the house are often on the chopping block
Expecting the show to retain one of it's fundamental aspects is "holding on to the past"? I'm (attempting to at least) holding on to whatever might remain of Big Brother, and that's not much anymore.

And if I am holding on to the past, it's because BB of the past was immeasurably better IMO.

As I said, the nominations interference nowadays is bad enough. Scrapping the nominations format completely would absolutely be the final nail in this show's coffin for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W View Post
I thought "reverse noms" might be interesting, where the whole house is always up for the public vote, and then the HMs decide which of the two with the most should leave on Friday.
BBAU did that for the first half of one of it's series, but I can't say it's something I'd love personally.

Last edited by Lostie!; 07-07-2015 at 05:40 PM.
Lostie! is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:40 PM #2
elliebrew's Avatar
elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
elliebrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie! View Post
Expecting the show to retain one of it's fundamental aspects is "holding on to the past"? I'm (attempting to at least) holding on to whatever might remain of Big Brother, and that's not much anymore.

And if I am holding on to the past, it's because BB of the past was immeasurably better IMO.
Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
__________________
elliebrew is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:42 PM #3
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
It's already changed in almost every aspect.

The format has evolved over the time but changing absolutely everything about it makes it not BB anymore.

That's fairly obvious to anyone with common sense.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:43 PM #4
Lostie!'s Avatar
Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
Lostie!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.
Lostie! is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:44 PM #5
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie! View Post
You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.
Yeah, and the "new audience" it's currently adapting to obviously don't want it either as the viewing figures disappear down the drain.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:45 PM #6
Liam-'s Avatar
Liam- Liam- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cardiff.
Posts: 23,995

Favourites (more):
BB19: Lewis F
CBB21: Shane Jenek


Liam- Liam- is offline
Senior Member
Liam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cardiff.
Posts: 23,995

Favourites (more):
BB19: Lewis F
CBB21: Shane Jenek


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie! View Post
You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.
Darn you for having a differing opinion, how stupid can you get mun
__________________
Liam- is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:46 PM #7
elliebrew's Avatar
elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
elliebrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liam- View Post
Darn you for having a differing opinion, how stupid can you get mun
Every single time i post you always try and be facetious about me disliking other peoples opinions.

I get it

you can stop trying to be funny now
__________________
elliebrew is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 06:19 PM #8
Jason.'s Avatar
Jason. Jason. is offline
-
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 30,222


Jason. Jason. is offline
-
Jason.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 30,222


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
you always try and be facetious
Carole BB8 is that you?

Last edited by Jason.; 07-07-2015 at 06:19 PM.
Jason. is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:45 PM #9
elliebrew's Avatar
elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


elliebrew elliebrew is offline
Senior Member
elliebrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,575


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie! View Post
You're asking me why I'm not open to it adapting in a way that I wouldn't personally find enjoyable? I think your answer is right there.

It sounds like yourself and this "new audience" don't want Big Brother at all, you want a whole other show merely using it's name.
I want a format that allows storylines to play out naturally. Relationships to form naturally

Scrapping the threat of being nominated by having the entire house up liberates the housemates and allows stories to progress without Gameplay.

SURELY its the very basis of the BB experience and something you should be championing
__________________
elliebrew is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 05:54 PM #10
Lostie!'s Avatar
Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Lostie! Lostie! is offline
Namaste
Lostie!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 26,498


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
I want a format that allows storylines to play out naturally. Relationships to form naturally

Scrapping the threat of being nominated by having the entire house up liberates the housemates and allows stories to progress without Gameplay.

SURELY its the very basis of the BB experience and something you should be championing
Nominations doesn't hinder the natural progression of storylines, constant interference does. I want the show to go back to having a regular, consistent nomination format without the producers trying to out-twist themselves week after week.

If certain housemates decide to use their nominations on a strategic level, so be it. I don't see how that would be hindering story progression, a housemate playing a strategic game is a storyline itself.

The fundamental aspect of Big Brother is the social experiment, putting together different people and seeing what happens. Nominations (where we truly get to see how people are reacting to one another) is a big part of this. Stripping that aspect wouldn't be amplifying the core aspect of the BB experience, it would be draining from it.

I just want the series to play out naturally. Housemates nominate, public evict, and repeat. And if they feel the need to add a twist one week (because a completely twist-free BB is definitely too much to ask for now), so be it.

I understand what you're saying and why you feel that way, but it's not something I'd like. Although, your suggestion may actually be preferable to the current state of nominations.
Lostie! is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 06:27 PM #11
abhorson abhorson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,768

Favourites (more):
BB16: Jack
CBB15: Katie Hopkins
abhorson abhorson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,768

Favourites (more):
BB16: Jack
CBB15: Katie Hopkins
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
It has changed and look at the ****e it has become recently.

Viewing figures tell a tale.
abhorson is offline  
Old 08-07-2015, 12:05 AM #12
minny03 minny03 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 822
minny03 minny03 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elliebrew View Post
Why must BB be a set format in your brain.

Why aren't you open to the possibility of it adapting and changing to suit its current audience.

Simply forcing the same tired format on a new audience only serves to beat it into the ground further.
Exactly. And consider the fact that if you look at some of the most long-running, successful reality shows on television, most of them have changed in some type of way because the producers on other shows have realized the importance of keeping a show fresh, new, and exciting for the viewers. It is extremely boring to just keep everything the same.

It blows my mind that most people still want head to head evictions, with only two people up and a VTE. Yes, that format may have somewhat worked years ago, but it does not work well in this current landscape. Many big characters go up for eviction way too early and then get evicted just because they have personality or are opinionated. That really needs to stop happening. VTS with the whole house up will ensure big characters will survive and there would be less producer manipulation.
minny03 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
future, nominations, scrapped, series


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts