[Withano]

I like the mixture of vote to evict and vote to win. It makes it interesting, without it marc would have been firm favourite by week 2 and the others wouldnt stand a chance.

If it was vote to save in the evictions, i think i'd want the final to be vote to lose.

The same voting style throughout makes the game boring to me. It works alright with cbb but thats only 3 weeks long.

Letting the fans both punish and reward behaviour with their votes are important aspects to the show imo

[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

I like the mixture of vote to evict and vote to win. It makes it interesting, without it marc would have been firm favourite by week 2 and the others wouldnt stand a chance.

If it was vote to save in the evictions, i think i'd want the final to be vote to lose.

The same voting style throughout makes the game boring to me. It works alright with cbb but thats only 3 weeks long.

Letting the fans both punish and reward behaviour with their votes are important aspects to the show imo

But is it really fair? Does it reflect what the viewers want? has it happened before and when?

you don't shoot the horse that is 3 lengths ahead in a race just so you can see which of the remaining nags crosses the finish line first.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

But is it really fair? Does it reflect what the viewers want? has it happened before and when?

you don't shoot the horse that is 3 lengths ahead in a race just so you can see which of the remaining nags crosses the finish line first.

Yes it reflects what the viewers want. I think youre forgetting that he topped both the favourite and least favourite housemate polls.. I think its important to keep negative and positive voting systems in place to give a more accurate result on what the viewers want and we do this. And its a good indication on what the viewers want.

[Griffin5779]

Originally Posted by Withano

Yes it reflects what the viewers want. I think youre forgetting that he topped both the favourite and least favourite housemate polls.. I think its important to keep negative and positive voting systems in place to give a more accurate result on what the viewers want and we do this. And its a good indication on what the viewers want.

sorry...but when he was near 50 % in a field of 9...and his favorable was 15 points higher then his negative...evictions was not a reflection of what the viewers wanted .. if was either a scam..or a system that allowed the minority to over ride the majority

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

sorry...but when he was near 50 % in a field of 9...and his favorable was 15 points higher then his negative...evictions was not a reflection of what the viewers wanted .. if was either a scam..or a system that allowed the minority to over ride the majority

Sorry, Think I misunderstood your thread for a genuine question for the forum to answer? Was it just an excuse to state your opinion?

If it was an actual question, then in my opinion, a person who is voted the least popular should not win the money and VTE does well to eliminate an unpopular housemate from winning and a mixture of VTE and VTW is the best way to reflect what the viewers want. If it was an excuse to state your opinion about how super awesome Marc was and how cross you are that the series didn't go your way and how the rules should change to suit your idealism, then you should have probably have made that clearer in your OP.

[Babayaro.]

Originally Posted by Withano

I like the mixture of vote to evict and vote to win. It makes it interesting, without it marc would have been firm favourite by week 2 and the others wouldnt stand a chance.

If it was vote to save in the evictions, i think i'd want the final to be vote to lose.

The same voting style throughout makes the game boring to me. It works alright with cbb but thats only 3 weeks long.

Letting the fans both punish and reward behaviour with their votes are important aspects to the show imo

Agree with this