[Ashley.]

I hate how Chloe has gone from getting little airtime to a lot of airtime. How are we supposed to form opinions and favourites when Big Brother keeps manipulating the show to decide who is liked and who is disliked? It's really pissed me off how we only get to be shown the argumentative side to Chloe one week before the final, when I've already formed my opinion on her and decided that I really like her.

I don't think the money has "changed" Chloe at all. I think she's always been argumentative, but now that the airtime isn't so Marc/Helen/Aisleyne-favoured, we're actually only being able to see it now. No doubt if we had live feed and were able to see Chloe's personality more, she would still be liked. It really annoys me.

The editing on the show just means that people will get evicted when they don't actually deserve it, and probably, for the fourth time in a row, we'll get a silly winner. Yeah, we only get to see 45 minutes of a 24 hour day, but if they took back all the stupid editing and over-dramatizations, we'd actually get to see a little more than we do.

[karezza]

I'm pissed off at Chloe's behaviour - she's a horrible creature.

[Northern Monkey]

Her true colours came out as soon as money was mentioned.

[Patricia4]

She is money crazy.

[Ashley.]

Did anyone even read my post?

[just thinkin]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

Did anyone even read my post?

i did..and I agree.

but the minute they threw the four safe people out two weeks into the show, who weren't nominated and who were safe.... I knew not to trust anything about the editing of the show. If you remember chloe did not even feature in those two weeks - now she seems to be the villain of the series (she's not). If she was that argumentative during the whole 8 weeks, then the other housemates would not like her - she's the only housemate that the all DO like however, and has barely been nominated by anyone - she would be safe this week also only for nasty nick buying his way to the final and selling her out.

Soo... in conclusion - if everybody in the house loves chloe - she must be doing something great and they all like her - if they are suddenly showing her being argumentative this week, you need to look at what they are not showing......the rest of them being argumentative a lot more. After all if she's the nicest in the house and she's being 'bold' now, what does it say about the others.

delighted she walks away with some money.

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by just thinkin

i did..and I agree.

but the minute they threw the four safe people out two weeks into the show, who weren't nominated and who were safe.... I knew not to trust anything about the editing of the show. If you remember chloe did not even feature in those two weeks - now she seems to be the villain of the series (she's not). If she was that argumentative during the whole 8 weeks, then the other housemates would not like her - she's the only housemate that the all DO like however, and has barely been nominated by anyone - she would be safe this week also only for nasty nick buying his way to the final and selling her out.

Soo... in conclusion - if everybody in the house loves chloe - she must be doing something great and they all like her - if they are suddenly showing her being argumentative this week, you need to look at what they are not showing......the rest of them being argumentative a lot more. After all if she's the nicest in the house and she's being 'bold' now, what does it say about the others.

delighted she walks away with some money.

This is what I mean. If the housemates were seeing what we were seeing, they'd hate Chloe, but they don't, so we're obviously not getting to see the nicer side of Chloe and that's what pisses me off the most. She was unfairly nominated to stop Jack from going home and making the final week boring. It's not even worth complaining to Ch5, they don't listen to the complaints. On BOTS whenever somebody complains, Rylan snatches to mic off of them and walks off. It's silly behaviour, and they're just trying to avoid confrontation. Reminds me of David Cameron tbh.

[just thinkin]

rylan is caught in the spiders web of BB - he doesn't know any better.

[BBUKAUSFAN]

I actual like the Chole we are seeing now compared to the one we seen a last week and back.

It a shame they had to destroy the series with so many twists to grab viewers and take less shine of potentially amazing housemates with stories to tell.

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by BBUKAUSFAN

I actual like the Chole we are seeing now compared to the one we seen a last week and back.

It a shame they had to destroy the series with so many twists to grab viewers and take less shine of potentially amazing housemates with stories to tell.

I agree. I don't know why they think that twists equal more viewers because it clearly doesn't.

[jaxie]

It's easy to blame the edit when a favourite falls from Grace but also its kind of a cop out because an edit can't put words into a housemates mouth nor change their actions. Chloe's words and actions are all her own. The reason she is shown more is because she perked right up when money came into the equation.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by jaxie

It's easy to blame the edit when a favourite falls from Grace but also its kind of a cop out because an edit can't put words into a housemates mouth nor change their actions. Chloe's words and actions are all her own. The reason she is shown more is because she perked right up when money came into the equation.

Very true

[just thinkin]

Originally Posted by jaxie

It's easy to blame the edit when a favourite falls from Grace but also its kind of a cop out because an edit can't put words into a housemates mouth nor change their actions. Chloe's words and actions are all her own. The reason she is shown more is because she perked right up when money came into the equation.

are you serious - do you know what an edit is? you can take one persons question in the morning - get another persons comment from the evening, and use that as an answer. don't you ever see talking dogs on youtube - you can also cut out 98% of an argument and leave in the 2% that is 'out of context' to make somebody look bad..... the very fact that they weren't able to change clothes for the last few days makes the 'editing' even easier

[Beso]

thickest hm ever!

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by just thinkin

are you serious - do you know what an edit is? you can take one persons question in the morning - get another persons comment from the evening, and use that as an answer. don't you ever see talking dogs on youtube - you can also cut out 98% of an argument and leave in the 2% that is 'out of context' to make somebody look bad..... the very fact that they weren't able to change clothes for the last few days makes the 'editing' even easier

I am completely serious. An edit isn't going to put the words it's selfish to take the money in her mouth. An edit isn't going to show her taking the money when she didn't. It's ridiculous to blame the edit for the things people are disliking about her. It's fine if you want to like her, I liked Jack even when others didn't but don't try to justify it with a white wash over the facts because that would be as dishonest as she is.

[jet]

Originally Posted by jaxie

I am completely serious. An edit isn't going to put the words it's selfish to take the money in her mouth. An edit isn't going to show her taking the money when she didn't. It's ridiculous to blame the edit for the things people are disliking about her. It's fine if you want to like her, I liked Jack even when others didn't but don't try to justify it with a white wash over the facts because that would be as dishonest as she is.

Spot on jaxie.

[REDCROP]

She's not been edited badly....she's been a nasty cow from the get go.....mostly she's just been clever at hiding it....

We saw exactly what she is the night Marc arrived.....he was a new housemate entering an established group of friends and trying to impress...he made a wise crack about her thinking he was being funny....it back fired because he didn't know her well enough and assumed she would get the humour ...Jade and Sam always understood his humour and laughed as loud as he did so he wasn't doing anything SO SO bad when you look back at it..but he def mis judged the situation and felt stupid afterwards

But the way she responded was shocking and way out of proportion and far more disturbing then the offensive joke...she verbally abused him, swore at him like some low life, threatened to attack him and then threw a glass at him....before going off to the diary room knowing that Danny would turn on him...If someone says something she doesn't like or she doesn't understand she reacts by verbally and physically attacking them ?...BAD NEWS

Just like when she was nominated the first time she caused a sh-t storm with her passive aggressive reaction which resulted in Brian and Helen going for each other and the whole house exploding....she lights the touch paper then sits back and watching it all go BANG

You don't need editing...you only need 5 seconds and a pair of eyes to see what she is

[Beso]

Originally Posted by REDCROP

She's not been edited badly....she's been a nasty cow from the get go.....mostly she's just been clever at hiding it....

We saw exactly what she is the night Marc arrived.....he was a new housemate entering an established group of friends and trying to impress...he made a wise crack about her thinking he was being funny....it back fired because he didn't know her well enough and assumed she would get the humour ...Jade and Harry always understood his humour and laughed as loud as he did so he wasn't doing anything SO SO bad when you look back at it..but he def mis judged the situation and felt stupid afterwards

But the way she responded was shocking and way out of proportion and far more disturbing then the offensive joke...she verbally abused him, swore at him like some low life, threatened to attack him and then threw a glass at him....before going off to the diary room knowing that Danny would turn on him...If someone says something she doesn't like or she doesn't understand she reacts by verbally and physically attacking them ?...BAD NEWS

Just like when she was nominated the first time she caused a sh-t storm with her passive aggressive reaction which resulted in Brian and Helen going for each other and the whole house exploding....she lights the touch paper then sits back and watching it all go BANG

You don't need editing...you only need 5 seconds and a pair of eyes to see what she is

harry laughed as loud as he did

what planet are you on?

[sampvt]

They are doing what they can to protect golden Balls Danny and get him to the line by editing his competitors out of the show. They need to get Chloe and then maybe Joel out and he will win but my sneaking feeling for jack is growing by the day.

Chloe is being edited quite a lot but they are not lip synching her, she is actually saying and doing these things, its just difficult to ignore when its so explosive what she is up to. She is evil and its showing when the money claws are out. Typical chav and scammer game player.

[REDCROP]

Originally Posted by sampvt

They are doing what they can to protect golden Balls Danny and get him to the line by editing his competitors out of the show. They need to get Chloe and then maybe Joel out and he will win but my sneaking feeling for jack is growing by the day.

Chloe is being edited quite a lot but they are not lip synching her, she is actually saying and doing these things, its just difficult to ignore when its so explosive what she is up to. She is evil and its showing when the money claws are out. Typical chav and scammer game player.

Can someone explain to me how you know BB want Danny to win and WHY do they want him to win...why wud Danny winning be better for BB then Jack or Christian or Harry ?....

[just thinkin]

Originally Posted by jaxie

I am completely serious. An edit isn't going to put the words it's selfish to take the money in her mouth. An edit isn't going to show her taking the money when she didn't. It's ridiculous to blame the edit for the things people are disliking about her. It's fine if you want to like her, I liked Jack even when others didn't but don't try to justify it with a white wash over the facts because that would be as dishonest as she is.

they can edit anything anyway they want - anytime, anywhere. bear that in mind. Delighted that she got the 5,000 and it was shown on tv - they can't re-edit that once it's out = she could sue.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by REDCROP

Can someone explain to me how you know BB want Danny to win and WHY do they want him to win...why wud Danny winning be better for BB then Jack or Christian or Harry ?....

Ive got 20/20 vision and when my hearing aids are turned on, I don't miss a thing, lol. Maybe I don't have blinkers on because I am not blinded by a fervent need to support my fav as he was ejected last week and all the rest left in are pond life. I don't need to be biased so being impartial is a great thing when making observations.

You should maybe take note of how Danny is being given storylines, good edits and his main competition is being decimated as we speak. Then you might pick up on stuff.

Danny is a proven media and fame ***** which makes him food and fodder for ch5 and the prods future plans for money spinners as he is good looking and has a personality as opposed to being a blob or a cornflake. Does that help ??????

[REDCROP]

Originally Posted by parmnion

harry laughed as loud as he did

what planet are you on?

Sorry my mistake....i meant to say Jade and Sam understood Marcs humour,,,not Jade and Harry....thanks for pointing that out...ive corrected it now

Harry def didn't get Marcs humour... ..which i can understand completely but i think it was a shame because i really liked them both even tho they didn't like each other...they had one big thing in common...they both said it straight and said it straight to the face..and they were also both prepared to be unpopular for the sake of the truth

[REDCROP]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Ive got 20/20 vision and when my hearing aids are turned on, I don't miss a thing, lol. Maybe I don't have blinkers on because I am not blinded by a fervent need to support my fav as he was ejected last week and all the rest left in are pond life. I don't need to be biased so being impartial is a great thing when making observations.

You should maybe take note of how Danny is being given storylines, good edits and his main competition is being decimated as we speak. Then you might pick up on stuff.

Danny is a proven media and fame ***** which makes him food and fodder for ch5 and the prods future plans for money spinners as he is good looking and has a personality as opposed to being a blob or a cornflake. Does that help ??????

I don't need any help....i wanted to know how people come to their conclusion that Danny is being steered to be the winner...i now understand what you think so thats answered my question....do i think you're correct ?..NO I DON'T....do i need to be patronised...NO I DON'T....i pick up on everything and have a very experienced eye and understanding of people and their motives....plus if Danny is being given such good storylines and editing then how come he comes across as a complete tool and a sly guy and was voted the biggest game player by the on line vote ?....and even that isn't true because no way is he the biggest game player or any game player, he's not intelligent enough to know how....

[REDCROP]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Ive got 20/20 vision and when my hearing aids are turned on, I don't miss a thing, lol. Maybe I don't have blinkers on because I am not blinded by a fervent need to support my fav as he was ejected last week and all the rest left in are pond life. I don't need to be biased so being impartial is a great thing when making observations.

You should maybe take note of how Danny is being given storylines, good edits and his main competition is being decimated as we speak. Then you might pick up on stuff.

Danny is a proven media and fame ***** which makes him food and fodder for ch5 and the prods future plans for money spinners as he is good looking and has a personality as opposed to being a blob or a cornflake. Does that help ??????

Why do you think i am being bias and not impartial ? And who do you think i blindly have a fervent need to support ? i don't get where you're coming from...My winner was Marc, of the remains housemates I'm more interested in who loses than wins because i don't feel strongly about any of them to be honest