| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
-- |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
Am I the only one who likes VTE?
It's the only thing that is similar to the C4 series, which we all hold in higher regard anyway. I don't mind VTS for CBB. So I think it's fine the way it is. Although, I wouldn't mind one VTS with the whole house up, like 3/4 in to the Civvy series, like around Week 8 or somet (Similar to Luke and Nikki sort of thing). Last edited by Jason.; 17-07-2015 at 04:04 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Namaste
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
Quote:
I prefer the sound of Who Goes? You decide, as opposed to Who Stays? You decide. I think I'm just weird, tbh. Last edited by Jason.; 17-07-2015 at 04:10 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Could still be the case ?
Just cos it would be VTS doesn't mean the motto has to change ? Like could be "Who Goes? You decide ! To save Chloe call....." I quite like Vicki's idea of VTS - VTE. But are 2 phonelines practical ? Last edited by the_answers; 18-07-2015 at 12:27 AM. Reason: Idea was VTS - VTE but could be VTE - VTS ? |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I'm wondering if ditching the prizefund might help. But then there's HMs like Nick who do little but just want to be in there for the BB experience. How about TWO BB's in 1 ? Prize for the first ££££ winner (who leaves say week 3). Then real BB winner wins at the end. Or something like that to ensure they're not just thinking about the final. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Both voting to save and evict can result in results that are unpopular.
I think BB should vary the voting system depending on the public reactions to housemates. For example when it is clear and obvious that social media sites have a hate campaign against a housemate and are deliberately likely to pile on hate votes. BB should then have a vote to save. Otherwise if no undue hatred is present then it should remain a vote to evict. We all to often lose interesting housemates because of the hate merchants. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|