[Marsh.]

Thick and long please.

[Cal.]

Must have aggression to protect me x

[Mystic Mock]

I love funny women so that would be the way to win me over.

And not looking like Sam Bailey would definitely help.

[Mystic Mock]

So yes my ranking goes like this.

1. Humor
2. Appearance
3. Ambition
4. Wealth
5. Loving (I want them to answer me back and treat me like an adult, not mollycoddle me)

[Natalie.]

Loyalty but

1.Humour
Loving
Appearance
Ambition
5.Wealth

[Josy]

All apart from wealth

[Niamh.]

I wouldn't say I had a check list, it's basically who I'm attracted to and click with really

[Black Dagger]

I need humour in my life, I'm not ****ing a boring drip that's for sure. (or anybody for that matter).

Basically. Humour > Loving > Ambition > Appearance > Wealth

[Raph]

Of those, in order of importance to me:

1) Ambition
2) Appearance
3) Wealth
4) Loving
5) Humour

[Niamh.]

Raph you're so shallow

[Liam-]

Wealth before loving?

[Black Dagger]

You can always love a new outfit x

[Raph]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Raph you're so shallow

I mean I wouldn't say shallow... i'd say strategic but I see where you're coming from. To be fair, all those points are important but I guess I just see the top three as most important.

[Raph]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Wealth before loving?

Yessir!

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Raph

I mean I wouldn't say shallow... i'd say strategic but I see where you're coming from. To be fair, all those points are important but I guess I just see the top three as most important.

So you see a relationship as more of a business strategy?

[Raph]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

So you see a relationship as more of a business strategy?

I think to a certain extent, yes. I sort of see a lot of things as a business strategy I guess. Of course the person has to be caring and there has to be that deeper connection but if they're not ambitious in the first place, I don't see a reason to follow that connection, if that makes sense. I consider myself to be quite ambitious so I guess I wouldn't want to be with someone who wasn't as ambitious as I was? Also ambition doesn't necessarily mean great success to me, it means more having a passion and really devoting a lot of your energy to it. Hope that makes me look less bad here hahaha

[Jay.]

Originally Posted by _LucasMichael_

I need humour in my life, I'm not ****ing a boring drip that's for sure. (or anybody for that matter).

Basically. Humour > Loving > Ambition > Appearance > Wealth

this would be my order tbh

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Jay.

this would be my order tbh

But Marsh had no humour?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Raph

I think to a certain extent, yes. I sort of see a lot of things as a business strategy I guess. Of course the person has to be caring and there has to be that deeper connection but if they're not ambitious in the first place, I don't see a reason to follow that connection, if that makes sense. I consider myself to be quite ambitious so I guess I wouldn't want to be with someone who wasn't as ambitious as I was? Also ambition doesn't necessarily mean great success to me, it means more having a passion and really devoting a lot of your energy to it. Hope that makes me look less bad here hahaha

haha, yeah I get what you're saying, I just think if there was no love or laughs then the person being ambitious (or on your level of ambition) would be irrelevant for me but I could deal with a person being less ambitious than me if our relationship was full of love and laughter, if you know what I mean?

[Liam-]

I'd literally find it impossible to be with someone if they had the sense of humour of a brick, they could be the hottest, richest person on the face of the planet, but if they're dull, then there's no way in hell I'd be able to be with them, but each to their own I guess, it probably just depends on what you want from life I suppose.