[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

Wasn't that a punishment or something though? For talking about nominations? Or am I getting confused with something else?

They put everyone up as punishment for Siavash refusing to nominate, but I don't see why switching the vote to VTS for one week was necessary (other than to keep the "louder" housemates in).

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

They put everyone up as punishment for Siavash refusing to nominate, but I don't see why switching the vote to VTS for one week was necessary (other than to keep the "louder" housemates in).

I think that was just to avoid the Nikki effect tbh

[AProducer'sWetDream]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

They put everyone up as punishment for Siavash refusing to nominate, but I don't see why switching the vote to VTS for one week was necessary (other than to keep the "louder" housemates in).

Oh yeah I remember that now. That's a bit of an odd punishment- I'd have thought that they'd have just put Siavash up or something.

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

Oh yeah I remember that now. That's a bit of an odd punishment- I'd have thought that they'd have just put Siavash up or something.

I think Charlie and Lisa were originally nominated... then they took them off and replaced them with the rulebreakers... idk

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Ashley.

I think that was just to avoid the Nikki effect tbh

Well yeah probably, but it just proves that they're certainly not above something like randomly changing the voting format to get / prevent a certain result.

Originally Posted by AProducer'sWetDream

Oh yeah I remember that now. That's a bit of an odd punishment- I'd have thought that they'd have just put Siavash up or something.

I always thought it was a shame that someone like Hira, who never broke rules and actually embraced the BB experience, lost out because of someone else's refusal to play by the rules.