[Jason.]

I still like Janice. I just find James annoying

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Daniel-X

Well I personally didn't find him the most entertaining. Sure enough he got arguments going and he could be entrancing but he could also be very boring and moody and sometimes he felt very repetitive.

I found Chantelle and Jodie to be a lot more entertaining

You make very good points. My opinion on that CBB is different to yours and that is ok too.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

James putting on an "act" makes no sense. If he was pandering to the viewers, why would be turn on someone who had a decent crowd response and who was in the top 4 for the sake of someone who's been booed a fair bit and wasn't?

He was in the top 4 as well. And got a huge cheer from the audience when he saved Janice.

[Jason.]

Originally Posted by EspeonBB

If Austin wins he'll be down there with the likes of Jim Davidson and Helen Wood for worst ever winners

Yeah...he won't.

[goldensunlight]

Originally Posted by Daniel_

James said he completely understands his frustrations and agreed with him, as well as offering him a hug but Austin refused and went on to ask him a ridiculous question, Austin's problem is that James doesn't agree with him and has his own mind.

A question that was so 'ridiculous' he couldn't answer it and had to walk out of the room. I wonder why.

[Daniel-X]

Originally Posted by Johnnyuk123

You make very good points. My opinion on that CBB is different to yours and that is ok too.

Yeah I suppose we can't all have the same favourites all the time. The forum would be very boring

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Daniel-X

Yeah I suppose we can't all have the same favourites all the time. The forum would be very boring

True. Either way we are enjoying the show.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by goldensunlight

A question that was so 'ridiculous' he couldn't answer it and had to walk out of the room. I wonder why.

James doesn't like to put anyone down unless it's his apparent best friend in the house

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

James doesn't like to put anyone down unless it's his apparent best friend in the house

Unless he thinks it will play well with the audience. Slimeball.

[Macie Lightfoot]

okay but it's not like everything Austin does isn't driven by what he thinks the public perception will be lmfao come on

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I'd like Austin to win,even moreso after the spitefulness of Janice tonight and the bizarre defending of her by James.
With friends like James who needs enemies.

With you on that one Joey

[BENDERBOY]

Hope he wins, his chances have just gone up with slimeball James's betrayal.

[jegmeister]

There are some very strange opinions on here. Anyone who thinks Austin is a nice person clearly has a very strange sense of what is right and wrong.

[Northern Monkey]

I find him to be an obnoxious little twat tbh.

[jet]

Originally Posted by jegmeister

There are some very strange opinions on here. Anyone who thinks Austin is a nice person clearly has a very strange sense of what is right and wrong.

It happens over and over again when you think of some past winners/near winners. Bizarrely, right and wrong doesn't seem to come into it any more. Some see 'right' as boring and 'wrong' as enticing. Some like loud mouths, bullies, insults and rudeness and see them as qualities to be admired in a person because it makes that person 'real'. Can't see it myself, or the people I know in my own life must be figments of my imagination, but each to their own.

[Mystic Mock]

I can understand why some people don't like Austin, but he owned James tonight who couldn't argue his points without portraying himself as a victim.

And he saved us from suffering the most cheesy highlights that I've ever seen.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

okay but it's not like everything Austin does isn't driven by what he thinks the public perception will be lmfao come on

Oh yes because Austin thinks that arguing on a 50 year old woman and arguing on a straight white male privilege Housemate are winning moves, come on.

And why are people using Helen and Jim as the lowest of the low winners when we've had Pete, Anthony, Rachel Rice, Sam Evans, Chloe, Paddy, and Alex Reid?

Oh and if she flooded the studio in her original series as much as she did in UBB then Cryandtelle would've been an horrific winner.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by jegmeister

There are some very strange opinions on here. Anyone who thinks Austin is a nice person clearly has a very strange sense of what is right and wrong.

Would you say that Austin's a nasty person? I think that his inbetween both nice and nasty.

And I find it more strange that people think that it's okay for James to betray his friend just because they don't like his friend.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Oh yes because Austin thinks that arguing on a 50 year old woman and arguing on a straight white male privilege Housemate are winning moves, come on.

And why are people using Helen and Jim as the lowest of the low winners when we've had Pete, Anthony, Rachel Rice, Sam Evans, Chloe, Paddy, and Alex Reid?

Oh and if she flooded the studio in her original series as much as she did in UBB then Cryandtelle would've been an horrific winner.

Like I said earlier, Austin's latest actions are really just him panicking because everything that he thought would work is blowing up in his face. He thought he could build James up and ride him to the end, but now it's working out in the exact opposite way.

And because Helen and Jim Davidson are legitimately awful people unlike a lot of the people you mentioned, but I know you're living in a world where Chloe is a nastier person than Farrah so I get why you're confused.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

Like I said earlier, Austin's latest actions are really just him panicking because everything that he thought would work is blowing up in his face. He thought he could build James up and ride him to the end, but now it's working out in the exact opposite way.

And because Helen and Jim Davidson are legitimately awful people unlike a lot of the people you mentioned, but I know you're living in a world where Chloe is a nastier person than Farrah so I get why you're confused.

I think that you're confusing me for someone else as I've not said that Chloe was nastier than Farrah, her treatment of Jack was bad but not on Farrah's level.

And likability should always play secondry to entertainment, which the ones that I've listed was not as entertaining, plus they did have unlikable traits themselves, just because they're not as unlikable than two louder people still doesn't mean that you can't be the worst thing of all a nasty bore.

[jet]

Originally Posted by goldensunlight

A question that was so 'ridiculous' he couldn't answer it and had to walk out of the room. I wonder why.

I'll tell you why....the question was so childish and provocative he didn't want to dignify it with an answer. I love that James walks away and refuses to be drawn in to Austin's taunts.

[jaxie]

Austn wants a friendship where he can call all the shots. James is proving to be his own man and isn't going to toe the line. I respect James for that far more than I respect Austin's childish tantrums egged on by Jenna. What a **** stirrer that woman is.

Janice's is a special fruitloop and Austin needs to be a bit more understanding. Love her, she's hilarious.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I think that you're confusing me for someone else as I've not said that Chloe was nastier than Farrah, her treatment of Jack was bad but not on Farrah's level.

And likability should always play secondry to entertainment, which the ones that I've listed was not as entertaining, plus they did have unlikable traits themselves, just because they're not as unlikable than two louder people still doesn't mean that you can't be the worst thing of all a nasty bore.

You listed Chloe and a lot of other questionable choices like Michelle Visage () in a thread literally titled "Has there ever been a nastier HM than Farrah?" so I don't think I have you confused for anyone else.

And again, quality over quantity. Helen and Jim Davidson unfortunately were Big Characters in their respective series, but I didn't find either of them to be all that entertaining. Rachel Rice, Chloe, and Paddy certainly entertained me more than they ever did, and I was very satisfied with each of their wins. It's also worth mentioning that this franchise is kinda in shambles and I think Chloe's win was nice and refreshing, reminding us that it is still possible to be a generally nice person and win BB.

[goldensunlight]

Originally Posted by jet

I'll tell you why....the question was so childish and provocative he didn't want to dignify it with an answer. I love that James walks away and refuses to be drawn in to Austin's taunts.

Or because he doesn't have a valid argument back and knows that Austin is in the right but he can't justify himself with a legitimate comeback.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

You listed Chloe and a lot of other questionable choices like Michelle Visage () in a thread literally titled "Has there ever been a nastier HM than Farrah?" so I don't think I have you confused for anyone else.

And again, quality over quantity. Helen and Jim Davidson unfortunately were Big Characters in their respective series, but I didn't find either of them to be all that entertaining. Rachel Rice, Chloe, and Paddy certainly entertained me more than they ever did, and I was very satisfied with each of their wins. It's also worth mentioning that this franchise is kinda in shambles and I think Chloe's win was nice and refreshing, reminding us that it is still possible to be a generally nice person and win BB.

Why can't nice but entertaining people win BB though like Scoop for example?

And I don't remember the Chloe comment but I'll take your word for it that I said it, but I definitely stand by that Michelle having homophobic views herself about how Perez should behave whilst telling everybody else to not be prejudiced in anyway was very annoying not to mention hypocritical, so yes I do think that's nastier than Farrah who at least practiced what she preached, even if it was bile.