Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
I think that you're confusing me for someone else as I've not said that Chloe was nastier than Farrah, her treatment of Jack was bad but not on Farrah's level.
And likability should always play secondry to entertainment, which the ones that I've listed was not as entertaining, plus they did have unlikable traits themselves, just because they're not as unlikable than two louder people still doesn't mean that you can't be the worst thing of all a nasty bore.
|
You listed Chloe and a lot of other questionable choices like Michelle Visage (

) in a thread literally titled "Has there ever been a nastier HM than Farrah?" so I don't think I have you confused for anyone else.
And again, quality over quantity. Helen and Jim Davidson unfortunately were Big Characters in their respective series, but I didn't find either of them to be all that entertaining. Rachel Rice, Chloe, and Paddy certainly entertained me more than they ever did, and I was very satisfied with each of their wins. It's also worth mentioning that this franchise is kinda in shambles and I think Chloe's win was nice and refreshing, reminding us that it is still possible to be a generally nice person and win BB.