Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos
Well... yes, I agree with that. There's no denying that, LOL. But the new article didn't seem very clear and you have certain news companies/people who refuse to say terrorist these days, so you never know. all I was saying is that it wasnt unreasonable to assume that it was an act carried out by someone who wanted to finish the job of killing him off.
|
You're actually supposed to call them "people of terrifying origin" now. "Terrorist" is derogatory
. Terror shaming, check your privilege.
Threaded Mode