[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

You KNOW that I am no terrorist appeaser - and I had this guy down just as you describe him - BUT, it is a total mystery then just WHY the authorities would choose to play in to the terrorists and their appeasers hands by NOT charging him?

As they have not charged him, then by law he is innocent and his 14 YEAR! imprisonment can only be categorised as unlawful - hence the perfectably reasonable agreement that he SHOULD be heavily compensated, AND my desire for a proper enquiry which will air the truth of this matter and answer my question of just why a man I was led to believe was a terrorist has yet been released without charge after 14 years?

We have a right to know the truth, and he has a right to compensation.

If he IS a terrorist, then the handling of this case by the authorities must be the biggest cock-up since Dunkirk.

I cannot believe even the Americans would unlawfully detain a completely innocent man for 14 years with no evidence whatsoever.

I have to believe the US authorities had plenty of Intel on this guy and there must have been some connections with jihadist groups or some sinister links with terrorism related organisations.

Surely being a Muslim with beard doesn't carry a 14 year prison term ??

If this is the case then I have to perhaps rethink my opening comments and pose the question what came first the terrorist or the terrorist government a sort of Chicken and Egg scenario ...