[bots]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

So its fine to kill those forced to be there?

Also if only ISIS targets are being hit...how come hospitals and such have been bombed?

I don't pretend to have the answers. I am still undecided on the whole issue to be quite honest. But those who think only ISIS members will be harmed through this are kidding themselves. Is collateral damage necessary? Maybe. But to pretend it won't happen at all, is ridiculous. As is the thought that the only other option to air strikes is peacetalks...

We have learnt a lot over the past decades.

Have there been any reports of civilian casualties from the British bombing of ISIS in Iraq? I will answer that one ... zero, nil, null. No civilian casualties whatsoever.

While its still possible for there to be civilian casualties, our guys at least, are very very careful on what targets that they hit and the possibility of civilian casualties.

Edit: While I'm on that topic. Some have said why are we there, we don't do anything that others can't do. Well, we bring the technology to reduce the risk of civilian casualties to the others in the coalition too. Our equipment in certain areas is way more advanced than anything anyone else has.