| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Averys new lawyer was.in Manitowoc this week with a forensic team to redo some up to date luminol testing.
There's also some rumours of a new suspect and that they were actually Theresas last stop that day, and the guys grandson who is in jail atm has asked to speak to the lawyer about what really happened. If you Google zipperers there's quite a few theories |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
..I don't know, all of the potential suspects just all seem like dodgy characters/shifty to me, which is the problem...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..also with one of the Zipperer theories, is that the blooming dog did it, he had threatened to have his dog eat any trespasser on his land...so the dog killed her and he had to cover that up...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..Josy/Niamh..(I can't find the autopsy report online..)..have we seen that..?..
..I'm probably being dumb here but with only charred bones/teeth etc and no confession from Steven Avery, how was it known about hand and ankle cuffed/rape/torture/her throat slit ..?..which would mean no blood/dna evidence if those never happened but wouldn't mean he hadn't killed her/burned her body though...and the 'confession' from Brendon told them nothing that they weren't manipulating him to confess, so they already seemed to know these things had happened anyway but how..?..
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
They manipulated the part about the rape because they needed to suggest a motive for Avery to have killed her. The throat cutting, purely and simply, is because they wanted Brendan to say that he saw Avery shoot her in the head and so they kept saying "What about the head, Brendan. Something about her head?" and two of his blatant GUESSES were that her throat was cut and that her hair was cut off. So they had to write that ridiculous narrative that they cut her throat but she didn't die so they then also shot her. Because the throat cutting comment was already on tape. The physical evidence proves two things ONLY about her death: she was shot in the head, and the body was burned. That's it. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
...but didn't they 'suggest' specific things to Brendon first though, what they wanted to hear..so some pretty gruesome imaginations from those detectives...oh, yeah that'll do, she's suffered enough, we're happy with that.../I'm not being flippant, it's all pretty sick tbh...one of the things that I've been considering this whole time though, is no blood, no evidence of restraint etc and lack of forensics and how that's explained....and was Steven that 'clever' to clear everything up to the extent that some DNA had to be planted...but the likelihood is, that none of it was ever there in the first place so doesn't slant toward his possible innocence at all....
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
...being shot in the head, which is the only thing we know as cause of death would be more of an execution killing..?...which wouldn't be the 'profile' of this creepy/disturbed person that Steven has displayed signs of in burning the cat...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|