[Ammi]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Absolutely. Regardless of whether they were guilty or not, it wasn't a fair trial. Brendan's defence lawyer was moronic and should of been struck off for breaking every rule in the book.

..he was a failed politician apparently (the first one..)...and only took the case on for the 'fame and fortune' as it were/the publicity...he had no interest in his client, I think I read that he had admitted that...I'm not sure if he's still practicing law or not actually...

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..he was a failed politician apparently (the first one..)...and only took the case on for the 'fame and fortune' as it were/the publicity...he had no interest in his client, I think I read that he had admitted that...I'm not sure if he's still practicing law or not actually...

Surely he isn't if he actually came out and admitted that? Disgraceful

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Surely he isn't if he actually came out and admitted that? Disgraceful

..I'll try to find the link but I have so many links stored and looked at so many sites and articles that specific ones are impossible to bookmark...but he had apparently just run for a State office or something and lost ..and felt that involvement in this case would help with a law career instead.../such a high profile case...he always looked in interviews as though he was preening himself for the cameras and it was all about him, not Brendan...I never liked the look of him...

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..he was a failed politician apparently (the first one..)...and only took the case on for the 'fame and fortune' as it were/the publicity...he had no interest in his client, I think I read that he had admitted that...I'm not sure if he's still practicing law or not actually...

Plus he was a court appointed lawyer so Brendan didn't get to choose.
I wanted to throw things at my tv when the judge asked Brendan if he thought
Kachinsky was doing a good job.