[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I didn't say that. I said if you can't afford to pay for things that your dog should have maybe you shouldn't get one.

But having a micro chip isn't a legal requirement and doesn't impact on your dogs health so it's up to the owner to decide how important it is to them, I don't think it should come down to if you can't afford to microchip you can't have a dog

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

But having a micro chip isn't a legal requirement and doesn't impact on your dogs health so it's up to the owner to decide how important it is to them, I don't think it should come down to if you can't afford to microchip you can't have a dog

Well. My post that you initially replied to was me asking why people wouldn't want to have their dogs chipped and you offered not being able to afford it as a reason, now you've changed that to it not being important to them which is an entirely different reason

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Well. My post that you initially replied to was me asking why people wouldn't want to have their dogs chipped and you offered not being able to afford it as a reason, now you've changed that to it not being important to them which is an entirely different reason

I didn't realise it was free now when I posted that., I haven't changed my view I have added to it, also it might be free now but when we moved house we had to pay 50.00 to update the details, so it might be "cheap" initially or free but there are added costs