[bots]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'm not particularly a Hilldawg fan either, but this thread is not about Hillary Clinton. As ever, I don't consider "Hmph well the other lot are just as bad!" to be any sort of an endorsement.

It all boils down to a choice between 2 candidates in the end though, so the hmph the other lot are just as bad cannot be argued against. If Trump is deemed the least bad, he will win and be the next president.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

It all boils down to a choice between 2 candidates in the end though, so the hmph the other lot are just as bad cannot be argued against. If Trump is deemed the least bad, he will win and be the next president.

true

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

It all boils down to a choice between 2 candidates in the end though, so the hmph the other lot are just as bad cannot be argued against. If Trump is deemed the least bad, he will win and be the next president.

Of course it can be argued against? "Less bad" doesn't mean good. "He will win and become the next president" also doesn't mean good.

I'm not really sure what you're getting at.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Of course it can be argued against? "Less bad" doesn't mean good. "He will win and become the next president" also doesn't mean good.

I'm not really sure what you're getting at.

when you have a choice of 2 the fundamental quality of the candidates becomes irrelevant. Surely that pretty clear. If they both score 1 out of 100 in a maths exam, they are **** at maths, but one of them will be deemed to be the best

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

when you have a choice of 2 the fundamental quality of the candidates becomes irrelevant. Surely that pretty clear. If they both score 1 out of 100 in a maths exam, they are **** at maths, but one of them will be deemed to be the best

This thread is neither about Hillary Clinton nor the US election though? It's about the character of Donald Trump and whether or not certain allegories are accurate or acceptable. The fact that he may or may not be marginally better or worse than another individual is entirely irrelevant to what sort of man he, himself, is... and that is ALL that this thread is about.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

This thread is neither about Hillary Clinton nor the US election though? It's about the character of Donald Trump and whether or not certain allegories are accurate or acceptable. The fact that he may or may not be marginally better or worse than another individual is entirely irrelevant to what sort of man he, himself, is... and that is ALL that this thread is about.

i was responding to YOUR comment on hilary, so put your superior attitude back in the box where it belongs please.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i was responding to YOUR comment on hilary, so put your superior attitude back in the box where it belongs please.

It was actually LT who brought up Hilary Clinton. As for the rest of it, if you find me to be "superior" that's entirely your problem, not mine .

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

and you think america would be any better under clinton?

look at what her husband did

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

It was actually LT who brought up Hilary Clinton. As for the rest of it, if you find me to be "superior" that's entirely your problem, not mine .

dont drag me into your spat