[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

The policeman shot what he thought was a deadly perp 9 times who turned out to be AN UNDERCOVER COP.

BIG DIFFERENCE


but still lets get the usual suspects together to bait the police

I'm not sure who is baiting the police. This is yet another unnecessary shooting.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

I'm not sure who is baiting the police. This is yet another unnecessary shooting.

LT defends police officers no matter what they do, it's always the victim's fault, it's never the perpetrator's.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

LT defends police officers no matter what they do, it's always the victim's fault, it's never the perpetrator's.

Unless its the Portuguese police in the McCann investigation.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

LT defends police officers no matter what they do, it's always the victim's fault, it's never the perpetrator's.

I was wondering if there would ever be an exception to the rule but apparently not. Even when the victim is also a cop. And the weapon is fired NINE times. Nine! Not nine random pot shots trying to get one hit - nine shots that all connected. At an obscured target. It's madness...

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

LT defends police officers no matter what they do, it's always the victim's fault, it's never the perpetrator's.

Why is it a dangerous attitude? What's going to happen? are we all going to be gunned down by LT in an early morning killing spree

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Why is it a dangerous attitude? What's going to happen? are we all going to be gunned down by LT in an early morning killing spree

Victim blaming is always a dangerous attitude and one that should be discouraged. If we blame the victims then the perpetrators can be vindicated for their actions.

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Victim blaming is always a dangerous attitude and one that should be discouraged. If we blame the victims then the perpetrators can be vindicated for their actions.

So you would rather the officer did not shoot and took a bullet instead?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Johnnyuk123

So you would rather the officer did not shoot and took a bullet instead?

Well, the undercover police officer seemed competent enough not to shoot a co-worker that he knew would be apart of the operation so your post makes no real sense.

(You should read articles before commenting on threads so that you don't embarrass yourself in future.)

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Well, the undercover police officer seemed competent enough not to shoot a co-worker that he knew would be apart of the operation so your post makes no real sense.

(You should read articles before commenting on threads so that you don't embarrass yourself in future.)

Apparently everyones post in any thread makes no sense to you. And we all need to read up and educate our selves too.