oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
1 is just about the worst, most pointless thing they could do. There is absolutely no point in trying to bring strategy to BBUK and turn it into a game if you're still going to allow the public to vote people out cause ~omg they spoke in an episode~ or ~omg she's a vile slut and he's so fit innit~. The point of implementing the US format is to turn it into the game it should be, but that can't work while it remains a glorified popularity contest where no one survives on any kind of merit. The house vote is the most important aspect to introduce, otherwise there's no point in bothering.
2 could be good because you'd cull the dull every week for sure, no problem with that. 3 wouldn't be too bad in still allowing the public some control although crucially not over who leaves, I'd change it so that they can't Veto noms too though...that's pointless.
4 is dull as hell and 5 is just messy and not at all exciting. 6 is the best option, and there's no reason why it couldn't be tweaked slightly so the public still get to have some influence - in fact it would add another dimension to the game.
|