Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
It's the charge that's specifying the age range "13 to 17", i.e. to differentiate from 18+ (an adult) and 12 or under (a child).
The boy was 16, not 13. If she wasn't his teacher, it would be legal... although, still pretty weird... but anyway. The crime she is guilty of is abusing a position of trust as a teacher; which, YES, is bad and something that she deserves to be charged for.
However, because of the ambiguous way the article is written, she will probably end up branded as a "paedo" or similar... which is just bull****.
|
Which imo is really serious, parents send their kids to school thinking that they are safe not that they're going to be preyed upon by their teachers. It's a horrific abuse of a position of such trust
Threaded Mode