Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh.
Any ACTUAL evidence would suffice.
|
Be specific.
At the moment, we know that he himself claimed to be working for ISIS and ISIS have claimed responsibility and we know that he was already known to the police as a radical.
We also know that the police, FBI, Governor, Homeland Security and and Predident have all said it was an Islamic terror attack.
What specifically would convince you that he is an ISIS terrorist? Do you even agree that he is an Islamic terrorist? If you don't, why should your opinion be more compelling to me than the FBI and the police?
13-06-2016, 12:09 AM
Threaded Mode