[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Marco contributed nothing though?

He contributed discussion on the Forums for his delusions, his revolting behaviour, and his obsession with BDSM.

Emma and Charlie have given me nothing to want to discuss about them other than what are they still doing there when the public could've just simply voted them off?

Don't get me wrong Marco nor Natalie should've won, but they shouldn't have been the first two that the public voted off.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

He contributed discussion on the Forums for his delusions, his revolting behaviour, and his obsession with BDSM.

Emma and Charlie have given me nothing to want to discuss about them other than what are they still doing there when the public could've just simply voted them off?

Being lightly slapped by a belt in order to try and seem even slightly mature sexually does not make him obsessed with BDSM.

I doubt he could even spell it.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Being lightly slapped by a belt in order to try and seem even slightly mature sexually does not make him obsessed with BDSM.

I doubt he could even spell it.

It's the closest to BDSM that Big Brother is ever going to reach is what I mean and it created topics on the Forum which as a fan I enjoy, wtf in particular has Emma given us?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

It's the closest to BDSM that Big Brother is ever going to reach is what I mean and it created topics on the Forum which as a fan I enjoy, wtf in particular has Emma given us?

It gave you topics about what his girlfriend posted on twitter, whether nipple sucking made other housemates uncomfortable and whether or not Marco was having some kind of breakdown or was born mentally retarded.

All contributing to one of the worst series of BB ever aired.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It gave you topics about what his girlfriend posted on twitter, whether nipple sucking made other housemates uncomfortable and whether or not Marco was having some kind of breakdown or was born mentally retarded.

All contributing to one of the worst series of BB ever aired.

Doesn't matter what the topics are, at least some was being created so that I could discuss it with other fans of the show.

Housemates like Emma I cannot stand as there's nothing to discuss about her other than she's "nice" which on BB translates as doesn't speak or argue.

If we had more Housemates like Emma and Charlie instead of the Marco's and Natalie's then there wouldn't be a TIBB, and there certainly wouldn't be anything to discuss.

As I've said as long as Marco and Natalie didn't win the show but last a certain distance then they don't offend me.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Doesn't matter what the topics are

Ok. We will end the discussion there.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Ok. We will end the discussion there.

So you agree with me then as I notice that you didn't quote my very valid points that you know is true.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

The first two evictions saw Marco and Natalie lose to Emma and Charlie who was duller in the vote, and have still contributed less to the series despite both lasting significantly longer.

How is that good voting?

I for one like Emma and Charlie a lot more than I liked Marco and Natalie

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

I for one like Emma and Charlie a lot more than I liked Marco and Natalie

bUT DID THEY SHOUT?????!!!!!!!

Everyone knows the higher the volume, tHE BETTER THE HOUSEMATE!!!!!

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

I for one like Emma and Charlie a lot more than I liked Marco and Natalie

You're talking about likability though, that's irrelevant when watching a TV Show.

It's like watching Game Of Thrones and wanting the Lannister's off the screen before the story calls for it just because they're not "nice" but they're sure as hell more entertaining than a lot of the other characters on the show and it would be duller if they went before the show ended.

[MB.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

You're talking about likability though, that's irrelevant when watching a TV Show.

Erm, this show's a popularity contest Mock

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by MB.

Erm, this show's a popularity contest Mock

It's first and foremost an entertainment show like all TV Shows are, then a Gameshow, then a popularity contest.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

You're talking about likability though, that's irrelevant when watching a TV Show.

It's like watching Game Of Thrones and wanting the Lannister's off the screen before the story calls for it just because they're not "nice" but they're sure as hell more entertaining than a lot of the other characters on the show and it would be duller if they went before the show ended.

I'm pretty certain by "like" Macie was referring to which ones he enjoyed watching. I.e. which ones entertain him.

Also, the people in Big Brother are real people. Comparing it to enjoying evil characters in a show about dragons isn't really relevant.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I'm pretty certain by "like" Macie was referring to which ones he enjoyed watching. I.e. which ones entertain him.

Also, the people in Big Brother are real people. Comparing it to enjoying evil characters in a show about dragons isn't really relevant.

Real people or not you're still watching the show and nasty people make better TV than nice people that don't want to make waves or tell jokes in case it offends people.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Real people or not you're still watching the show and nasty people make better TV than nice people that don't want to make waves or tell jokes in case it offends people.

Charlie is someone who is nice, offering nothing to discuss, making no waves or jokes in case it offends people? Ok.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Charlie is someone who is nice, offering nothing to discuss, making no waves or jokes in case it offends people? Ok.

Well Charlie isn't seen as nasty is she? The way the show edits her is someone that's conflicted about her feelings for Jason, not some spiteful bitch that's wanting to take them all down.

And I've honestly never heard Charlie tell a joke have you? If so I must've missed it.

She's like a poor man's Lea from BB7.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Real people or not you're still watching the show and nasty people make better TV than nice people that don't want to make waves or tell jokes in case it offends people.

That's not entirely true 100% of the time though. Every series is different it's not as easy as making blanket statements like "well he's nasty so he's entertaining" and "she's in a showmance so she's not a good housemate."

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

That's not entirely true 100% of the time though. Every series is different it's not as easy as making blanket statements like "well he's nasty so he's entertaining" and "she's in a showmance so she's not a good housemate."

Exactly. Can anyone say they actually enjoyed much of Helen/Pauline in BB15 at their worst? Or Jade and her clan in CBB5?

Can't say I did.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

That's not entirely true 100% of the time though. Every series is different it's not as easy as making blanket statements like "well he's nasty so he's entertaining" and "she's in a showmance so she's not a good housemate."

It's extremely rare that a nasty Housemate on BB is one of the duller contestants of their year.

In fact the only time that I can think of it was Conor in BB13.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

You're talking about likability though, that's irrelevant when watching a TV Show.

It's entirely relevant because I'd much rather watch Emma and and Charlie than Marco and Natalie.