[Will.]

But then people moan that it's ridiculous having like 7/8 people up

I think if it meant that 4 will be up then I get it, but there were already 3/4 HM's with more noms.

[Yaki da]

I'm not watching. But I just read this. You can't blame Channel 5 for these things, it is the production team who are responsible.

[Calderyon]

Originally Posted by Will.

But then people moan that it's ridiculous having like 7/8 people up

I think if it meant that 4 will be up then I get it, but there were already 3/4 HM's with more noms.

The point is, BB needs to be consistent with the rules.

Technically on week 2 for example, Emma and Marco shouldn´t have been up. Andy and Georgina had the most noms.

Charlie shouldn´t have been up in week 3 either. Hughie and Natalie had the most noms.

Georgina and Evelyn shouldn´t have been up on week 4. Andy and Jayne had the most noms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Br...inations_table

[Will.]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

The point is, BB needs to be consistent with the rules.

Technically on week 1 for example, Emma and Marco shouldn´t have been up. Andy and Georgina had the most noms.

Charlie shouldn´t have been up in week 2 either.

Yeah I guess, although head to head evictions are a very rare thing with CH5 BB, they don't seem to really ever do them.

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Will.

But then people moan that it's ridiculous having like 7/8 people up

I think if it meant that 4 will be up then I get it, but there were already 3/4 HM's with more noms.

Yeah but we want consistency ffs. The 2 or more nom rule is ****ing rediculous but if they go with it they should stick with it and not change the rules whenever it suits them.