[mysargasso]

Originally Posted by Lstan

Thanks for all your replies this is interesting and I guess im a bit perplexed.

Andy doesn't seem popular in the house (maybe i'm wrong) but it lead me to believe the reason they gave him immunity because they don't see him as a threat? Whats your view on it? Do they want Jayne out the way or is something else going on?

They're playing the game way too diplomatic, unfortunately; targeting housemates that they feel haven't appreciated their time in the house, or at the center of drama. What they should be doing is playing it with the aim to topple their strongest competitors.

So that's why Jayne and Andy were targeted initially, which ended up backfiring because realistically how can you argue for giving someone who has threatened to walk so many times immunity over another who, in the eyes of the majority, is a **** stirrer?

But I do think there is something to be said about giving Andy the immunity. I think the house has a pretty good idea, based on the poll results, that Andy will most likely not win. So keeping him all the way to the finals is actually pretty good game planning. It increases the odds of others to win if th are surrounded by the weaker and less popular of housemates.

But in all honesty, the housemates are too thick to see that game plan playing out.