[Withano]

Originally Posted by hot2go

The two situations are the same ....they are both young parents who want to make a better future for their children....personally I don't ever consider that a valid reason to give housemates immunity but then I'm not the one who went around saying it should be. If it was a valid reason for keeping Lateysha then it should be the same valid reason for keeping Jackson. Myself I would have pressed the same button as Jason did and thrown Jackson out the same door that silly cow went through. You think Jacksons child is less deserving than Lateysha child based on the principle that you don't like him. WELL Jason didn't like Lateysha and neither did loads of us on here so I really see no difference at all.
It seems to me that Jason wasn't allowed to dislike Lateysha but you are allowed to dislike Jackson.

I dont really care for either of them, you made the assumption that i like lateysha because you didnt like the answer i gave. Which is just a bit silly and forces your argument to a close.

One man ending one persons time in the house is not the same as the british publuc ending one persons time in the house. This is obvious (lol)

Theyre both parents and thats the only similarity. One was unjustly removed from the house and one will be fairly voted out. The housemates and the public will not care for Jacksons eviction because of the way it was fairly done.