[Mullens123]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

One of many. LOL at you. They have a whole set of rules (in other words no rules) and then wait to see what the results are and then go with the one that allows them the best chance to get rid of who they want. In other words, they are rigging their own show. The most frequently used over the last 3 years has been anyone with 2 is up.

I never said they're not rigging their own show, I completely believe they are and think it's rubbish... But once again you're saying that you want the rule to be one way because it's the most common one used. The fact is unless it's consistent it's hardly a rule... You're saying because it's the most frequently used it should be expected, so perhaps this is one of the anomaly weeks where that rule isn't used, just like what has been going on for the last three years.

So if like most others (like myself) you want a consistent nomination rule why don't you just wait and see if this is a new change rather than to berate it before you have any proof. If next week things change (which they probably will) then you have ground to criticise what is being done, rather than to rely on an inconsistent "rule" as the expectation.