[Mullens123]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

One of many. LOL at you. They have a whole set of rules (in other words no rules) and then wait to see what the results are and then go with the one that allows them the best chance to get rid of who they want. In other words, they are rigging their own show. The most frequently used over the last 3 years has been anyone with 2 is up.

I never said they're not rigging their own show, I completely believe they are and think it's rubbish... But once again you're saying that you want the rule to be one way because it's the most common one used. The fact is unless it's consistent it's hardly a rule... You're saying because it's the most frequently used it should be expected, so perhaps this is one of the anomaly weeks where that rule isn't used, just like what has been going on for the last three years.

So if like most others (like myself) you want a consistent nomination rule why don't you just wait and see if this is a new change rather than to berate it before you have any proof. If next week things change (which they probably will) then you have ground to criticise what is being done, rather than to rely on an inconsistent "rule" as the expectation.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Mullens123

I never said they're not rigging their own show, I completely believe they are and think it's rubbish... But once again you're saying that you want the rule to be one way because it's the most common one used. The fact is unless it's consistent it's hardly a rule... You're saying because it's the most frequently used it should be expected, so perhaps this is one of the anomaly weeks where that rule isn't used, just like what has been going on for the last three years.

And I have complained about it for 3 years.

So if like most others (like myself) you want a consistent nomination rule why don't you just wait and see if this is a new change rather than to berate it before you have any proof.

Because they have done this year after year. Every time the most frequently used rule of anyone with 2 noms up might produce the "wrong" result, they abandon it.

If next week things change (which they probably will) then you have ground to criticise what is being done, rather than to rely on an inconsistent "rule" as the expectation.

I have ground to criticize because they've been doing this for years now and people seem to just give them a free pass. I would like for them to clarify what the rules are. But they don't do that, because no one asks them to do it. I shouldn't have to wait until the next rounds of noms to find out (and even then, we won't be sure because they make it up as they go). It should be on their website and they should inform us, especially when a different rule was used throughout most of the normal BB.

[Mullens123]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

And I have complained about it for 3 years.

Because they have done this year after year. Every time the most frequently used rule of anyone with 2 noms up might produce the "wrong" result, they abandon it.

I have ground to criticize because they've been doing this for years now and people seem to just give them a free pass. I would like for them to clarify what the rules are. I shouldn't have to wait until the next rounds of noms to find out. It should be on their website and they should inform us, especially when a different rule was used throughout most of the normal BB.

I understand your frustration as its the main thing that's caused me to switch off last series. I tried contacting a member of production about it and they responded to all my queries but danced around the nomination rule. If they stuck to the 2 Noms and you're up rule Id be fine and agree today's result was a farce, but just because it's not wholly consistent im willing to see if they've finally gone back to the original rule. Although im totally prepared for a dissapointment next week.

[Clootie Dumpling]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

... It should be on their website and they should inform us, especially when a different rule was used throughout most of the normal BB.

[lewis111]

It's a bit stupid to put less up in a VTS tbh like if they did make it 2 noms and you're up a lot of people would pay to save Marnie and probs Bear (ew)