[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

This is the crux of my point, I am suggesting that this subterfuge and the choice of refugee/unknown origin immigrant has been structured with a divisive intent to create uncertainty, confusion and doubt in the minds of the public against child refugees.
e
Case in point, who are these children, are these even children?
Massive media coverage to disguise the fact that many unaccompanied children have not been processed as agreed.

Shouldn't we be questioning JUST WHY children as young as 8 ARE 'unaccompanied'? As well as JUST HOW they managed to travel many hundreds of miles through strange and foreign countries to get to Calais?

Shouldn't we be examining whether this is yet another 'ploy' by economic migrants who are so desperate to secure entry into the UK they simply hand their children over to uncle Ahmed to take them with him on his long trek to Calais, knowing that we British WILL eventually take in the children, thereby setting a legal precedence for them to later be also allowed entry because of 'family ties'. (Uncle Ahmed will obviously have to keep 'Stum' about his relationship though for this to be viable)