[Marsh.]

Erm don't sully Niamh's mind with filth.

[T*]

i just read the first thread and skipped to the last one without reading wtf happened

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Christmas Sherry

We are too pure for this Niamh. #irishcolleens

Youtube video

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

[Niamh.]

Ugh i cant post stuff normally on my phone

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

[user104658]

Originally Posted by McGregrrrrrrrr

Ugh i cant post stuff normally on my phone

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

NIAMH. Go to the tapatalk "main page", press the little silhouette guy on the top right, press settings, scroll down and you'll find "Signature" and turn that **** off. You're welcome!

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Santa

NIAMH. Go to the tapatalk "main page", press the little silhouette guy on the top right, press settings, scroll down and you'll find "Signature" and turn that **** off. You're welcome!

Thank you

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Aubrey O'Christmas Day

It's not your forum to tell people how to post or when to post. If I want to use to indicate I agree with somebody I will

()

Not here for people coming for the best emote on the forum

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Livia

Kirk is entitled to voice his opinions whether or not you agree. That is debate. Personally I find some of your opinions to be quite wacky... but I wouldn't stop you voicing them. Kirk is passionate about his opinions, so are you. The fact you disagree doesn't mean one of you is completely wrong and the other completely right. I feel like Kirk was hounded away. And he's not the first. The trick, as far as I can see, is this: learn to be insulting without actually breaking the rules; say something outrageous to someone then say you were only joking or post the little joker emoticon; always remember to make a point of quoting or addressing someone who's trying their best to ignore you... apparently that's not considered baiting, so do it until someone reacts, then you can hit the 'report' button and they'll get infracted. Also, if someone has a different opinion from you, they are obviously the devil incarnate.

Come back Kirk. We can't afford to lose another poster or this place will end up with the same bunch of people all agreeing with each other and posting the little "applause" emoticon after each other's posts.

The thing is though, I rarely initiated any conversation with the guy, especially towards the end, because I actually found the debates we had quite boring. He'd retaliate to my posts (very occaisionally with insults) and get in a huppety when I reply.
Its difficult to talk about someone when theyre not here to defend their self... its unfair really, But I can tell you with certainty that he isnt the angel youd like him to be...
I rarely ever made or make threads in serious debates and news, but its just difficult for me to ignore borderline-xenophobia when I saw it on the homepage, and obviously I like to reply if somebody quotes me when i do post there.
his departure clearly made an impact on some users, but the only change for me personally, is the lesser relevance on the debates subforum, and I dont mind that much on a bb forum.
If kirk misses others as much as others miss him, im sure he'll come back.


Furthermore, I very rarely use emojis, and i rarely initiate debates by directly quoting somebody (usually just type my initial reaction to an OP and then come back if somebody quotes it) so I dont think your trick for no bans applies to me really.. I have never been banned (never actually had 3 infractions at the same time, I always assumed that it was a '3 strikes and youre out' rule until earlier on in the thread) Id like to think that I havent been banned because I wouldnt insult a member, despite getting a few insults thrown at myself, even here you called my opinions wacky.. Bit uncalled for.
I have agreed with all but one of my infractions and I understand the boundaries which kirk and the other banned members have crossed. Theres little use sulking. Kirk would probably still be here if he wasnt banned for rule-breaking in the first place.. But he did rule-break so he got banned, decided life was unfair and vowed to never come back.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Withano

The thing is though, I rarely initiated any conversation with the guy, especially towards the end, because I actually found the debates we had quite boring. He'd retaliate to my posts (very occaisionally with insults) and get in a huppety when I reply.
Its difficult to talk about someone when theyre not here to defend their self... its unfair really, But I can tell you with certainty that he isnt the angel youd like him to be...
I rarely ever made or make threads in serious debates and news, but its just difficult for me to ignore borderline-xenophobia when I saw it on the homepage, and obviously I like to reply if somebody quotes me when i do post there.
his departure clearly made an impact on some users, but the only change for me personally, is the lesser relevance on the debates subforum, and I dont mind that much on a bb forum.
If kirk misses others as much as others miss him, im sure he'll come back.


Furthermore, I very rarely use emojis, and i rarely initiate debates by directly quoting somebody (usually just type my initial reaction to an OP and then come back if somebody quotes it) so I dont think your trick for no bans applies to me really.. I have never been banned (never actually had 3 infractions at the same time, I always assumed that it was a '3 strikes and youre out' rule until earlier on in the thread) Id like to think that I havent been banned because I wouldnt insult a member, despite getting a few insults thrown at myself, even here you called my opinions wacky.. Bit uncalled for.
I have agreed with all but one of my infractions and I understand the boundaries which banned members have crossed.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Christmas Sherry

One, whats funny about me not wanting to talk about somebody much without them being here
Two, Im not the one getting bans so I must be doing something right

[Jason.]

He always seemed to throw his toys out of the pram and argue with the moderators like Dezzy for example, whenever he got infracted for breaking the rules and he never took any responsibility. It's like those people who think they can do/say what they like but get into a sulk when they're challenged over it.

And correct me if I'm wrong, but his leaving is just another example of that. Things not going his own way. He wasn't even banned. (I don't think).

Good riddance, I guess.

[Tom4784]

Kirk was actually pretty good when it came to handling his infractions.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Christmas Sherry

I'm not leaving, They will be taking me out in my coffin

I'd like Dezzy to shoulder my box out of TiBB

He can't cherie he got too many chips on his shoulder

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Winslet

I'm a valued member of this forum ty.

Of course you are Lucas x

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by December

Me:

Take my hand, stay Kirk
Heaven's not
Ready for you
Every part
Of my aching heart
Needs you more
Than the angels do

Boy
Where do you think you're goin'?
Where do you think you're goin'
Goin', boy?
Boy
Where do you think you're goin'?
Where do you think you're going boy?

Kirk:

When I bow down to pray
I try to make the worst seem better
Lord, show me the way
To cut through all his worn out leather
I've got a hundred million reasons to walk away
But baby, I just need one good one, good one
Tell me that you'll be the good one, good one
Baby, I just need one good one to stay

Originally Posted by Big Meaty Claws

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Miss Claus

Of course you are Lucas x

Love you

[Josy]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He can't cherie he got too many chips on his shoulder

See this just extremely petty and insulting but it's expected to be ignored because it's aimed at a mod yet had it been a mod aiming this at a member you would have been one of the first to quote it and shout about bias, abuse of power etc.

I've said this before and I mean it snipes at mods will be treated the same as snipes and insults aimed at any member!

[arista]

"I've said this before and I mean it snipes at mods will be treated the same as snipes and insults aimed at any member! "


Yes I agree with Admin , on this

Mods are HUMANS - handle with care


I have felt this
and was nearly banned, last year,
So tibbers - LEARN FROM ADMIN


Feel The Force

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Kirk was actually pretty good when it came to handling his infractions.

Yes Dezzy.
he took those Whips
Tough Guy Kirk


Come back Kirk
Follow Admin like I do

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Toy Santa

Like features are a nightmare on any forum... they inevitably end up being used for not-so-covert ganging up and very little else. I remember on my own forum (may she rest in peace) we had one for about 5 minutes. NOTHING but problems. Someone would post something a bit snippy and then a dozen tag-along-Tammys (the ones without the backbone to post anything confrontational for themselves) would "like" the post. Urgh. It should just be called the "Me Too Me Too!" function.

And the clapping emote should be changed to a little smug face chanting that.

I legitimately hate it. . **** off. Say something for yourself or don't bother to post at all. People will argue that it's a simple way of saying "I agree!". No one cares that you agree! Quote the post and say something interesting as to why you agree, or just leave the post to stand on its own two feet ffs.

Its a bloody emoticon, it doesn't represent every instance of dickish pack mentality you've ever come across on the internet. Most people use it perfectly innocently and it's absurd to be so wound up about it.

(And I said most, not all before someone decides to list off whenever someone did use it to be a dick).

[Alf]

Originally Posted by ~HO~HO~HO~

See this just extremely petty and insulting but it's expected to be ignored because it's aimed at a mod yet had it been a mod aiming this at a member you would have been one of the first to quote it and shout about bias, abuse of power etc.

I've said this before and I mean it snipes at mods will be treated the same as snipes and insults aimed at any member!

The other day I had a post deleted and was infracted for politely telling Dezzy I won't be discussing any issue with him , because in my view, he doesn't play fair. (It wasn't Dezzy who infracted me)

The post I quoted was Dezzy spreading lies about me, so after I had been infracted I decided to report Dezzy's post, guess what? it's still there and I assume nothing happened to Dezzy?

One rule for you mods, another for the rest of us.

So forgive me for thinking that you're talking rubbish.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Alf

The other day I had a post deleted and was infracted for politely telling Dezzy I won't be discussing any issue with him , because in my view, he doesn't play fair. (It wasn't Dezzy who infracted me)

The post I quoted was Dezzy spreading lies about me, so after I had been infracted I decided to report Dezzy's post, guess what? it's still there and I assume nothing happened to Dezzy?

One rule for you mods, another for the rest of us.

So forgive me for thinking that you're talking rubbish.

No need to be rude and rubbish my post.

Actually I just had a look, since you brought up your infraction, you never posted politely alf you took the opportunity to have a dig, if you don't wish to debate with certain members then the adult way to go about it is to make use of the ignore option not quote the member that you say you don't want to debate with and post to them? That makes no sense tbh.

Having looked at the post you reported I don't find it to be offensive or insulting to you at all which is more than likely why it wasn't removed from the forum.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by ~HO~HO~HO~

No need to be rude and rubbish my post.

Actually I just had a look, since you brought up your infraction, you never posted politely alf you took the opportunity to have a dig, if you don't wish to debate with certain members then the adult way to go about it is to make use of the ignore option not quote the member that you say you don't want to debate with and post to them? That makes no sense tbh.

Having looked at the post you reported I don't find it to be offensive or insulting to you at all which is more than likely why it wasn't removed from the forum.

Of course you don't, that's my point. You never do when it comes to Mods.

But my post wasn't offensive to him, yet mine was deleted.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Alf

Of course you don't, that's my point. You never do when it comes to Mods.

But my post wasn't offensive to him, yet mine was deleted.

It's not true that I never do when it comes to mods there's been plenty occasions where I have overturned infractions and bans when I felt they were unfair and other mods have done too, we also have a discussion thread for every infraction that's given out and they are posted in a lot.

Of course you won't believe me if your minds already made up but it's the truth and plenty of members that have had infractions and bans overturned could confirm it.

[Firewire]

Where is Nicole Burks' thread?