Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
Neither have you from what I know so does that mean we should discount what you have to say as well? It's a silly and lazy argument that's designed to discount opinions that someone can't argue against.
TS has the right of it, it doesn't matter who the killed party was. All that matters is that they were apprehended. Killing someone in combat situations is fine but executing them without due course when they've been detained is not and the court obviously agrees.
You can't have soldiers that act out like that, order must be maintained within the troops or it all falls apart, you don't need battlefield experience to understand that.
|
for all you know the perp could have been about to get up and attack and so the soldier terminated him before he could do that, that is what he is trained to do - to see potential threat before joe public does