[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Just watched it again, he shows his finger to Nicola, ( why is she getting off scott free she instigated the whole prank) then pokes James on the bottom, I don't think that is sexual assault, harassment maybe but it was dark and he was no where near his anus, but maybe that was due to luck more than judgement !

I'm pretty sure that if i went up to a woman in the street and did that then i'd end up on the sex offenders register.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Just watched it again, he shows his finger to Nicola, ( why is she getting off scott free she instigated the whole prank) then pokes James on the bottom, I don't think that is sexual assault, harassment maybe but it was dark and he was no where near his anus, but maybe that was due to luck more than judgement !

I can't watch the vid as my computer is a dick, but from the screengrabs it kinda looks like he is knuckle deep in James buttcrack..

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I can't watch the vid as my computer is a dick, but from the screengrabs it kinda looks like he is knuckle deep in James buttcrack..

To me it looks like he goes "under and up" and there must be some perineum, or at least buttcrack, contact.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

To me it looks like he goes "under and up" and there must be some perineum, or at least buttcrack, contact.

The technical term is 'stink bridge'

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

The technical term is 'stink bridge'

[Vanessa]

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its tantamount to finger rape

[Vicky.]

LOL. This happened yet the news is...

http://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/...-in-cbb-house/



Reaching slightly..and no mention of what Austin did, funnily enough

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

LOL. This happened yet the news is...

http://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/...-in-cbb-house/



Reaching slightly..and no mention of what Austin did, funnily enough

Bloody pathetic and no homophobic words used

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

LOL. This happened yet the news is...

http://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/...-in-cbb-house/



Reaching slightly..and no mention of what Austin did, funnily enough

I actually think it's slightly prejudiced to assume that he WAS being homophobic . It literally didn't cross my mind that he was referring to him being gay when he said that. Just that he was warning him that he's messing with someone who is going to bite back .

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Nancy Littlebottom

Possibly...but then he should've taken Austin to one side the next day and made it clear he wasn't happy. Maybe he did...we don't know.

Like, honestly. You dont have to support your favourtie housemate through EVERYTHING.
He can do awful stuff and still be your favourite, sure.. But when you downplay awful stuff and pass it off as anything else, it just weakens any credibility

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I can't watch the vid as my computer is a dick, but from the screengrabs it kinda looks like he is knuckle deep in James buttcrack..

It happened really fast, can't imagine James staying quite about it it was as bad as people are making out

[Withano]

I just rewatched it, I wasnt expecting it to be as bad as it was because of how little people picked up on it, but there was a direct attempt to place his finger between his cheeks and that is ejection worthy imo, I could have forgave the kick, but with the new added context of Austin going out of his way to invade, it just looks so much more sinister.

[chuff me dizzy]

My granddaughter had a lesson in school when she was 6 ,and was told the "Private areas" you should never be touched " where Austin touched James is one of those areas

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Withano

I just rewatched it, I wasnt expecting it to be as bad as it was because of how little people picked up on it, but there was a direct attempt to place his finger between his cheeks and that is ejection worthy imo, I could have forgave the kick, but with the new added context of Austin going out of his way to invade, it just looks so much more sinister.

Totally agree, and Nicola was as bad encouraging it ,and Im an Austin fan ,but what he did was out of order and a sex attack

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Withano

I just rewatched it, I wasnt expecting it to be as bad as it was because of how little people picked up on it, but there was a direct attempt to place his finger between his cheeks and that is ejection worthy imo, I could have forgave the kick, but with the new added context of Austin going out of his way to invade, it just looks so much more sinister.

True, even if he did "miss the target" the intention is still pretty clear, and that's surely what matters. That he thought it was even vaguely OK .

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

True, even if he did "miss the target" the intention is still pretty clear, and that's surely what matters. That he thought it was even vaguely OK .

And that some viewers think its ok too...tbh

I had a facebook argument about this earlier today during which I was told that

1) It didn't happen at all. So I presented proof in the form of your post with screengrabs then
2) The screenshots were too dark to see anything. When pointed out that wa sa lod of bollocks and you could clearly see it changed to
3) Austin was drunk and did it by mistake. To which I stated that he held his finger up and smirked before doing it so he clearly did know. So then it was
4) Silence.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

And that some viewers think its ok too...tbh

I had a facebook argument about this earlier today during which I was told that

1) It didn't happen at all. So I presented proof in the form of your post with screengrabs then
2) The screenshots were too dark to see anything. When pointed out that wa sa lod of bollocks and you could clearly see it changed to
3) Austin was drunk and did it by mistake. To which I stated that he held his finger up and smirked before doing it so he clearly did know. So then it was
4) Silence.

There's some sick people about

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

And that some viewers think its ok too...tbh

I had a facebook argument about this earlier today during which I was told that

1) It didn't happen at all. So I presented proof in the form of your post with screengrabs then
2) The screenshots were too dark to see anything. When pointed out that wa sa lod of bollocks and you could clearly see it changed to
3) Austin was drunk and did it by mistake. To which I stated that he held his finger up and smirked before doing it so he clearly did know. So then it was
4) Silence.

I just don't understand how so many people missed it on the first viewing . He clearly gestures to Nicola that he's going to do it before he does, I was like "Err surely he's not actually going to..." so I guess I was watching to see if he actually went through with it... so to speak...

[Epic.]

This thread furthers Austin into Bottom 10 housemate territory for me

[Nancy.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

My granddaughter had a lesson in school when she was 6 ,and was told the "Private areas" you should never be touched " where Austin touched James is one of those areas

Oh yes, my sister's kids are around the same age and they've been talking about it in school too. I know kids need to report such things but I can't help but be sad that they're being educated about such things and their innocence is being lost. When I was a kid I was playing hopscotch and dancing around with skipping ropes. I never even knew the correct named for our private parts until I was around 10 or 11.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Nancy Littlebottom

Oh yes, my sister's kids are around the same age and they've been talking about it in school too. I know kids need to report such things but I can't help but be sad that they're being educated about such things and their innocence is being lost. When I was a kid I was playing hopscotch and dancing around with skipping ropes. I never even knew the correct named for our private parts until I was around 10 or 11.

I agree, but its a dirty world we live in Nancy and anything that protects kiddies is good

[Nancy.]

Originally Posted by Withano

Like, honestly. You dont have to support your favourtie housemate through EVERYTHING.
He can do awful stuff and still be your favourite, sure.. But when you downplay awful stuff and pass it off as anything else, it just weakens any credibility

Why are you following me around like a bad smell? I don't support my favorite housemates through EVERYTHING. If they've done something I don't agree with, I will admit it. I even said said it was wrong of him to touch James's arse-cheeks earlier. Bloody hell, what more do you want?

[Nancy.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

I agree, but its a dirty world we live in Nancy and anything that protects kiddies is good

Yep. True.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Nancy Littlebottom

Why are you following me around like a bad smell? I don't support my favorite housemates through EVERYTHING. If they've done something I don't agree with, I will admit it. I even said said it was wrong of him to touch James's arse-cheeks. Bloody hell, what more do you want?

I love Austin and will defend him when he's in the right, but cannot defend this