| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
The US will never see the UK as anything but it's "51st state", it's sidekick li'l bitch. May weasling up beside Trump is utterly pathetic, and the very people who talk about the UK being subservient to the EU seem to be all for it . Not happy to play underdog to the EU but perfectly happy to get on all fours and display our pink little rump to Daddy Trump. Why? Do you think Britain is strong and can stand alone or not?? Decide! PLEASE.
Last edited by user104658; 27-01-2017 at 12:39 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The EU is also going to have to work with Trump aswell.All countries who want to trade with the US are.We may not like him but he does look much more favourably on the UK than Obama did.If he's offering us a good deal and telling us that we're at the front of the queue we would be fools not to take advantage of the situation. I'm sure Theresa May isn't fond of him either but she seems to be acting professionally and getting on with the job.She's been to other countries aswell as America.It's only going to put us in a stronger position during Brexit negotiations. We don't have to be Trumps bitch to do a trade deal with the US.Theresa seems like a strong leader so far and i can't see her getting pushed around by Trump or getting dragged into anything she doesn't think is in our best interests. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Please don't post things about little pink rumps, I now have a mental image of Nicola Sturgeon I never wanted to see.
__________________
In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this. Terry Pratchett “I am thrilled to be alive at time when humanity is pushing against the limits of understanding. Even better, we may eventually discover that there are no limits.” ― Richard Dawkins Last edited by jaxie; 27-01-2017 at 04:33 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Of course we need to have trade deals... I just find it fascinating that people who are so terrified of "EU overlords" are perfectly happy to see their precious Bwitain sold off piece by piece to US based privatisation.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
Pretty much, it highlights the fact that Brexit wasn't so much about escaping EU's 'Tyranny' as Leave voters would have us believe as it was about that other major issue that defined the referendum....
Last edited by Tom4784; 27-01-2017 at 06:31 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
crystal ball alert Last edited by Tom4784; 27-01-2017 at 06:31 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
I'm going to explain how time works since you seem a little bit confused.
You see, the referendum happened in what is now called the past, that means it's already happened. This stuff about a deal with the US and how it's kind of hypocritical for Brexit voters to want us to be Trump's bitches yet oppose us being in the EU because they don't want us to be the EU's bitches is happening in what's known as the present. Your comment suggested that I was making predictions for something that hasn't happened yet, that's called the future. Taking a fact from the past and present to make a statement doesn't really make it a prediction for the future but that's okay, I'm sure some other people struggle with the concept of time too
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
just you thinking you know exactly why people voted as per ![]() and by the way, you got the ref and the usa elections totally wrong didnt you?
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|