[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Is it unacceptable behaviour to out prejudice where you see it?

Nobody is saying you can't be as prejudiced as you want... go for it but for gods sake own it. If you are proud of your views and opinions what would it matter who opposes them?

Labeling people PC is a way of denigrating any and all counter argument as they are too shamefaced to stand behind what they advocate imo.

That's exactly what Supporters of multiculturalism and open borders have attempted to do to anyone with different views - they label them racist etc. They dished it out, but can't take it back.

Your words 'to out prejudice where you see it' says it all for me, you can't see it as your opinion, you assume your opinion to be fact. Those that support multiculturalism cannot/will not see that questioning such issues does not in itself make people prejudice - that is simply their interpretation - not fact. It does not entitle people to label others because they disagree with their views. If they insist on doing that then they can't complain when the tide turns.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

That's exactly what Supporters of multiculturalism and open borders have attempted to do to anyone with different views - they label them racist etc. They dished it out, but can't take it back.

Your words 'to out prejudice where you see it' says it all for me, you can't see it as your opinion, you assume your opinion to be fact. Those that support multiculturalism cannot/will not see that questioning such issues does not in itself make people prejudice - that is simply their interpretation - not fact. It does not entitle people to label others because they disagree with their views. If they insist on doing that then they can't complain when the tide turns.

So, a bit like how you've accused me of being sexist multiple times to try to silence my opinion in the past? I didn't act like a victim though, I took that accusation and ripped it to shreds.

An accusation is just an accusation, and meaningless unless true. If someone calls another person a racist when they aren't then it's an easy thing to refute. People only get antsy about it when they are racist but don't want to admit it.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

So, a bit like how you've accused me of being sexist multiple times to try to silence my opinion in the past? I didn't act like a victim though, I took that accusation and ripped it to shreds.

An accusation is just an accusation, and meaningless unless true. If someone calls another person a racist when they aren't then it's an easy thing to refute. People only get antsy about it when they are racist but don't want to admit it.

It never ceases to amaze me how you always seem to see your response as 'ripping it to shreds'. If you say so.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

It never ceases to amaze me how you always seem to see your response as 'ripping it to shreds'. If you say so.

I refuted your silly little claim without having to resort to your tactics of whining about being called a bigot,

That's what you do when someone accuses you of something, you don't whine about the word and try to turn it into something that can't be said because it hurts your feelings. Refute it or accept it, there are no other options.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I refuted your silly little claim without having to resort to your tactics of whining about being called a bigot,

That's what you do when someone accuses you of something, you don't whine about the word and try to turn it into something that can't be said because it hurts your feelings. Refute it or accept it, there are no other options.

wrong, its slander supported by the left which people should sue over. just as those falsely accused by money grabbers should counter sue and take the false accusers to hell

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I refuted your silly little claim without having to resort to your tactics of whining about being called a bigot,

That's what you do when someone accuses you of something, you don't whine about the word and try to turn it into something that can't be said because it hurts your feelings. Refute it or accept it, there are no other options.

Obviously your idea and my idea of proof don't agree. In my book you proved nothing. It's all about context.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

That's exactly what Supporters of multiculturalism and open borders have attempted to do to anyone with different views - they label them racist etc. They dished it out, but can't take it back.

Your words 'to out prejudice where you see it' says it all for me, you can't see it as your opinion, you assume your opinion to be fact. Those that support multiculturalism cannot/will not see that questioning such issues does not in itself make people prejudice - that is simply their interpretation - not fact. It does not entitle people to label others because they disagree with their views. If they insist on doing that then they can't complain when the tide turns.

The tide hasn't turned, prejudice is still prejudice...

I don't assume anything, there's no point trying to wriggle out of your prejudice because you are ashamed.....Embrace your inner bigot.

Be loud and proud, if you feel a certain way and that defines you then accept it, don't bitch and whine and try redefine it :/

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

The tide hasn't turned, prejudice is still prejudice...

I don't assume anything, there's no point trying to wriggle out of your prejudice because you are ashamed.....Embrace your inner bigot.

Be loud and proud, if you feel a certain way and that defines you then accept it, don't bitch and whine and try redefine it :/

I don't support open borders. I don't support controlling religions - the more dictorial and opressive they are the more I dislike them. Make of that what you will - but I understand that that is just your opinion, even if you don't.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I don't support open borders. I don't support controlling religions - the more dictorial and opressive they are the more I dislike them. Make of that what you will - but I understand that that is just your opinion, even if you don't.

Yes we know, you remind us again and again. Its only because we consider your argument weak that we come back at you.

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Yes we know, you remind us again and again. Its only because we consider your argument weak that we come back at you.

What makes Brillos argument weak and yours strong though? Just interested

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Tozzie

What makes Brillos argument weak and yours strong though? Just interested

Did I say mine was strong?

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Did I say mine was strong?

No but you said "thats why WE come back at you"

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Did I say mine was strong?

You certainly implied it. It would be rather odd to criticise someone for something you felt could apply to you.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Tozzie

What makes Brillos argument weak

On this particular topic?
Shes implied that she is against forum members calling others names such as racists or bigots, despite her labelling many members as a sexist in the past
She wants freedom of speech but wants to stop others from calling right wing people mean names
She wants PC culture to come to an end despite endlessly arguing against: people protesting against governments, people namecalling in general, and posts that she believes to be anti-feminist

Her argument is so weak, in so many different ways. She claims to be fighting against PC whilst having many PC traits, and she is fighting for freedom of speech whilst suggesting that others should not have the same privilege.
And this mindset is very similar to the woman in the video. Its senseless, contradictory, and hypocritical.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

On this particular topic?
Shes implied that she is against forum members calling others names such as racists or bigots, despite her labelling many members as a sexist in the past
She wants freedom of speech but wants to stop others from calling right wing people mean names
She wants PC culture to come to an end despite endlessly arguing against: people protesting against governments, people namecalling in general, and posts that she believes to be anti-feminist

Her argument is so weak, in so many different ways. She claims to be fighting against PC whilst having many PC traits, and she is fighting for freedom of speech whilst suggesting that others should not have the same privilege.
And this mindset is very similar to the woman in the video. Its senseless, contradictory, and hypocritical.

That is twisted beyond belief. If certain people are going to try to label me because they don't like my opinions they can't then expect me to hold back when I don't like theirs. I never start it.

It isn't me that wants it all their way. You really don't seem to know half of what's occured so until you do it's probably best you refrain from giving your not so well informed opinion.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Yes we know, you remind us again and again. Its only because we consider your argument weak that we come back at you.

So be it. I assume you consider your argument fact, I think you will find many would disagree.

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

The tide hasn't turned, prejudice is still prejudice...

I don't assume anything, there's no point trying to wriggle out of your prejudice because you are ashamed.....Embrace your inner bigot.

Be loud and proud, if you feel a certain way and that defines you then accept it, don't bitch and whine and try redefine it :/

A bigot is a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions. It seems you are intolerant towards someone who doesn't agree with your opinions, I guess we are all bigots in one way or another. Embrace your inner bigot