| FAQ | 
| Members List | 
| Calendar | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
|  |  | 
| BB18 Big Brother 18 UK was shown on Channel 5 in June and July 2017, and was won by Isabelle with Raph second. Discuss the series here. 
  Housemates (tags): 
  Andrew,  Arthur,  Chanelle,  Charlotte,  Deborah,  Ellie,  Hannah,  Imran,  Isabelle,  Joe,  Kayleigh,  Kieran,  Lotan,  Mandy,  Raph,  Rebecca,  Sam,  Savannah,  Simone,  Sue,  Sukhvinder,  Tom, HM Fan clubs (appreciation) | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  08-06-2017, 02:51 PM | #1 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned | 
			
			Its Rebeccas business, she had a dress code ( as lots of workplaces have ) and Sukhvinder should mind her own business
		 | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 02:54 PM | #3 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned | 
			
			Lots of places have a make up rule you couldn't work on a beauty counter without it ,lots of offices also have a make up and clothing rule if you're not happy to stick to their code, you just don't apply to work there I see nothing wrong in it whatsoever
		 | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:13 PM | #4 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Hands off my Brick! | Quote: 
   
				__________________ Spoiler:  | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:14 PM | #5 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned |  | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:17 PM | #6 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Hands off my Brick! | 
			
			As long as they look presentable and are doing the job they shouldn't have a say in whether or not you wear make up.
		 
				__________________ Spoiler:  | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:22 PM | #7 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			I agree. I remember when i was at college they used to make people wear makeup and if you didn't you would be sent home. Its so stupid i dont like that women at all, shes strikes me as extremely shallow.
		 | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:23 PM | #8 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned |  | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:17 PM | #9 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| I Cant Breathe | 
			
			Actually you can not make them do anything like a few years back a woman took her boss to work for making her wear high heels and won
		 
				__________________  Spoiler:  | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:22 PM | #10 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned | 
			
			You couldn't turn up to work in Boots in a hoody and jeans
		 | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 03:25 PM | #11 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | Quote: 
 Gender-based dress codes and grooming standards are a sort of exception to the usual rules about workplace sex discrimination. In all other respects, employers are required to treat men and women equally. Employers may not impose different rules or requirements on women than on men. For example, an employer could not legally require women to have more experience than men to be hired for a position, nor could they require women to arrive at work an hour earlier than men. In general, employers cannot create different performance, productivity, or conduct standards for women and men. Similarly, employers are not allowed to bow to customer preference in any other respect when it comes to gender in the workplace. For example, courts have held that airlines may not discriminate against men who want to be flight attendants, even if their customers would prefer to be served by women. And, employers may not discriminate against women for jobs in the C-suite, even if their clients would be more comfortable doing business with men. Laws prohibiting sex discrimination are intended to change these cultural stereotypes, not to further them. In the area of personal appearance, however, gender-based differences are allowed. And, because they are often upheld in the context of customer service positions like yours, it seems that part of the rationale has to do with customer expectations. Customers want to be served meals and drinks from employees who are well-groomed and look neat, and in our culture, that translates differently depending on whether the employee is male or female. Courts have upheld different grooming standards and dress codes for men and women, including the requirement that women wear -- and men not wear -- makeup. Different hair requirements and clothing requirements have also generally been found to be legal. In one case, a federal appeals court allowed a casino to require female employees to wear makeup, to tease or style their hair, and to wear stockings, requirements that seem clearly intended to make these employees appear more sexually attractive to customers. If a dress code or grooming requirement imposed a significant burden on one gender only, that might cross the legal line. For example, if men could wear any clothing they wanted, but women had to purchase uniforms at significant expense for the same job, a court might find this requirement to be discriminatory. Short of a heavily one-sided expense like this, however, different grooming codes for men and women are legal. Source: employment law firm 
				__________________   | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 06:19 PM | #12 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			Racism is a discrimination on race....discrimination can be against any one regardless of race. But if Rebecca said its 'similar' or 'like' racism she's painting a picture and using it as a similarity to explain it.so I can see where she is coming from. It doesn't surprise me Sukhvinder jumped on it. I am sure her husband would have dealt with it better rather than making a big issue over it.
		 | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 06:31 PM | #13 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned | Quote: 
 | ||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 06:51 PM | #14 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			They are so different in nature...but then opposites often attract and one often stabilises the other. She certainly is high maintenance..
		 | |||
|   | 
|  08-06-2017, 06:58 PM | #15 | ||
| 
 | |||
| User banned |  | ||
|   | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
| 
 | 
 |