[SarenaW]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Ffs...I'm not upset by it....I'm making a point and a comparison..

But if anything, it supports Raph's "prank ethics" as you call it.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by SarenaW

But if anything, it supports Raph's "prank ethics" as you call it.

I disagree...his prank with the eggs was aimed at the majority of the house that were then known as the 'clique' that he did not like. But tonight he said he only pranked his close friends knowing they would take it the right way...that's a contradiction.

[SarenaW]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I disagree...his prank with the eggs was aimed at the majority of the house that were then known as the 'clique' that he did not like. But tonight he said he only pranked his close friends knowing they would take it the right way...that's a contradiction.

No, he said "If I do targeted pranks it's always going to be to one of my close friends because then it's not about malicious intent, it's just funny. If not then I would do a group collective prank such as putting lotion in the hand soap because then it could be anyone, and I think that would be quite funny versus targeting a specific person."

Hannah is a close friend that he has a very playful friendship with, so he felt like she would understand his prank and find the humour in it.

The egg in butter prank was at anyone, because he was not close friends with anyone at that point (besides maybe Chanelle).

There is no contradiction. I literally have the episode paused on my screen and typed that as he spoke.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I disagree...his prank with the eggs was aimed at the majority of the house that were then known as the 'clique' that he did not like. But tonight he said he only pranked his close friends knowing they would take it the right way...that's a contradiction.

rusti,you shouldn't have to keep explaining it, it is quite obvious what you mean,but it will be mainly ignored or people will declare they 'don't understand it' as it's not something they can answer honestly,because some will defend a fave no matter what they do,the classic example is Charlotte supposed 'bitching' but all other housemates are allowed to do it.

[Littlegreen]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

rusti,you shouldn't have to keep explaining it, it is quite obvious what you mean,but it will be mainly ignored or people will declare they 'don't understand it' as it's not something they can answer honestly,because some will defend a fave no matter what they do,the classic example is Charlotte supposed 'bitching' but all other housemates are allowed to do it.

I completely understand.

But it's a bit of a mute point to compare a week 1 prank, when they were still feeling each other out. To a prank with friends 6/7 weeks down the line.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

rusti,you shouldn't have to keep explaining it, it is quite obvious what you mean,but it will be mainly ignored or people will declare they 'don't understand it' as it's not something they can answer honestly,because some will defend a fave no matter what they do,the classic example is Charlotte supposed 'bitching' but all other housemates are allowed to do it.

I know Kaz...it gets frustrating when people come on to a thread and fail to discuss the point raised.
I just need to read into it...and if no one sees the point or discusses it..it's because they don't want to see it...or they can't defend it.